Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Delhi State Industrial And Infrastructure – Appellant
Versus
Bawana Infra Development Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of arbitration dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against the award. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 20) |
| 3. respondent's defense of the award. (Para 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 , 30) |
| 4. court's observations on the award's validity. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. court's conclusion on setting aside part of the award. (Para 64 , 70 , 106 , 110) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set-aside award with respect to Claim No.1, 2, 5, 9 and 12.
Any other order or relief as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may be passed in the facts and circumstances of the present case."
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The petition is filed against the impugned Award dated 12th September 2018 passed by Justice R.C. Jain (Retd.), the learned Sole Arbitrator. The Arbitration proceeding in the current matter arose out of Concessionaire Agreement dated 20.07.2011 with respect to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
