Back
SACHIN DATTA
Kamal Rana – Appellant
Versus
Anju Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sachin Datta, J. The present revision petition filed under section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (the `DRC Act') assails the order/judgement dated 17.01.2019 passed by CCJ cum ARC, Pilot Court (Central District) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (the `rent controller') in eviction petition No. 930/2018, whereby the rent controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner and allowed the eviction petition filed by the respondent.
2. The respondent/landlord filed the instant eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act to recover possession of one shop on the ground floor in premises bearing no. 29/24, Shakti Nagar, Delhi (the `tenanted premises'), let out to the petitioner/tenant, on the ground of bona fide requirement of respondent's daughter to open a coaching institute for her livelihood.
3. It was stated in the eviction petition that the building in question consists of two floors. On the ground floor there are 9 shops, all of which are let out to different tenants. The tenanted premises is one of such shops. It was also stated that there are 3 rooms, one kitchen, and a toilet on the ground floor, however, entry towards thos
The Court emphasized the presumption of bona fide need in favor of the Landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, and the restrictive scope of interference by the High Court in re....
The landlord's authorization to file an eviction petition, the bona-fide need for the tenanted shop, and the unavailability of reasonably suitable alternative accommodation were central to the court'....
The landlord's bona fide need and the absence of suitable alternative accommodation for the tenant are crucial factors in determining eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
The plea of availability of alternative accommodation must be supported by material, and it is not for the tenant to dictate to the landlord how to accommodate himself.
The landlord-tenant relationship, the landlord's bona fide need, and the rent amount were key legal principles established in the judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the landlord's bona fide need for the tenanted premises must be objectively assessed, and the suitability of alternative accommodations must b....
The landlord's bona fide requirement for the tenanted premises is to be judged based on preference and suitability for the intended business, and the employment status of dependent family members doe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
