Back
JYOTI SINGH
Liberty Footwear Company – Appellant
Versus
Liberty Shoes Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the trademark dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. response by the respondent asserting their rights. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments against the petitioner's claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. petitioner's rebuttal to jurisdictional issues raised. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's considerations following arguments. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. interpretation of section 42 regarding jurisdiction. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. court's analysis on the maintainability of the petition. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. final judgment and ruling on the petition. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. Present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as `1996 Act') seeking the following reliefs:
"A. An order of interim injunction restraining the Respondent, its directors, partners, business associates, principal officers, agents, dealers, distributors, franchisees, manufacturers, and all others acting for and on their behalf, from directly or indirectly using the Petitioner's "LIBERTY" marks, and/or a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
