C. HARI SHANKAR
Meera Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Priti Saraf – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Statutory provisions have been reproduced in footnotes only to the extent they are relevant.]
1. Meera Goyal ("Meera" hereinafter) challenges, in this petition under Section 34[1] of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 ("the 1996 Act"), award dated 8 May 2020 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in an arbitration instituted against Meera by the respondent Priti Saraf ("Priti" hereinafter).
[1]34. Application for setting aside arbitral award. -
(1) Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside such award in accordance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3).
(2) An arbitral award may be set aside by the Court only if-
(a) the party making the application 45[establishes on the basis of the record of the arbitral tribunal that -
(i) a party was under some incapacity; or
(ii) the arbitration agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law for the time being in force; or
(iii) the party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or
Radha Sundar Dutta v. Mohd. Jahadur Rahim
South East Asia Marine Engg. and Constructions Ltd. v. Oil India Ltd.
Patel Engg. Ltd. v. North Eastern Electric Power Corpn. Ltd. (Neepco)
Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn.
Kuldeep Singh v. Commr. of Police
Army Welfare Housing Organisation v. Sumangal Services (P) Ltd.
Satyanarayana Construction Co. v. Union of India
McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
Ssangyong Engineering & Construction, SEAMEC, Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem
State of Chhattisgarh v. Sal Udyog Pvt. Ltd.
NHAI v. P Nagaraju, Delhi Airport Metro Express
Union Territory of Pondicherry v. P. V. Suresh
Shree Ambica Medical Stores v. Surat People's Co-operative Bank Limited
IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. v. Pearl Beverages Ltd.
Tata Consultancy Services v. Cyrus Investments (P) Ltd.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
Shri Hanuman Cotton Mills v. Tata Air Craft Ltd
Kailash Nath Associates v. DDA
Bhagwati Prasad Pawan Kumar v. U.O.I.
Dr. Gurmukh Ram Madan v. Bhagwan Ram Madan
Alupro Building Systems Pvt Ltd v. Ozone Overseas Pvt Ltd
State of Rajasthan v. Ferro Concrete Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. Shree Ganesh Petroleum
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd v. Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking
UHL Power Co. Ltd. v. State of H.P.
Dyna Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.
Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI
Parsa Kente Collieries Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.
Manalal Prabhudayal v Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd
T.P. George v. State of Kerala
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. State of J & K
Secy., Irrigation Deptt., Govt. of Orissa v. G. C. Roy
Executive Engineer, Dhenkanal Minor Irrigation Division v. N. C. Budharaj
Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd v. State of Orissa
Morgan Securities & Credits (P) Ltd v. Videocon Industries Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.