SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 603

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Sh. S. L. Saini - Appellant
Versus
Sh. Gyanender Bharti & Ors. - Respondents
CONT.CAS(C) 623 of 2014 & CM APPL. 38778 of 2018, CM APPL. 21862 of 2023
Decided On : 19-03-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Mr. Rishabh Kumar and Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Rhea Verma, Advocate for DJB/R-2 with Mr. Gopal Banik, DEO/South-East.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Advocate for R3.

IMPORTANT POINT
Contempt proceedings cannot continue if the party is acting in accordance with the law and processing the land without delay.

Headnote:

Contempt - Land Acquisition - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 4, Section 5 - The court found that the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) had ultimately forwarded the requisition to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi for land acquisition, and the process was in progress in accordance with the 2013 LA Act. The court held that as long as the DJB was acting in accordance with the law and processing the land without delay, no contempt proceedings could continue against the respondents.

Fact of the Case:

The contempt petition alleged disobedience of a court order by the respondents regarding the acquisition of land by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB).

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the DJB had ultimately forwarded the requisition to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi for land acquisition, and the process was in progress in accordance with the 2013 LA Act. The court held that no contempt proceedings could continue against the respondents as long as the DJB was acting in accordance with the law and processing the land without delay.

Issues: Alleged disobedience of a court order, Contempt proceedings

Ratio Decidendi: Contempt proceedings cannot continue if the party is acting in accordance with the law and processing the land without delay.

Final Decision: The court closed the contempt petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail all other remedies as may be available in accordance with the law.

ORDER (Oral)

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. This contempt petition alleges contumacious and wilful disobedience, by the respondents, of order dated 17 May 2012 passed by this Court in WP(C) 7167/2009. The said order reads thus:

    "1. Pursuant to the order dated 25.01.2012, counsel for the respondent No.2/DJB states that he has obtained instructions from the Department to the effect that the DJB has approached the Land and Building Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, with a request to acquire the parcel of land measuring 2 Bighas 12 Biswas situated in Khasra No.590/55/1 and 592/55/2 and place the same at the disposal of the DJB, as it would not be possible for the Department to give the petitioner access to his land through the STP, Okhla. He hands over a copy of the letter dated 16.05.2012 addressed by the respondent No.2/DJB to the Deputy Secretary (LA), Land and Building Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, with an advance copy to the other side. The same is taken on record.

    2. Mr. Pathak, who appears for respondent No.3/Govt. of NCT of Delhi, states that the aforesaid letter is not in proper format and in the first instance, the respondent No.2/DJB shall have to submit a request to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi for acquisition of the land in question and only thereafter, would the question of working out the compensation in respect of the land arise. This aspect can be mutually resolved by the two departments. However, the relief sought by the petitioner herein stands satisfied in view of the respondent No.2/DJB finally taking a stand that it proposes to approach the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to acquire the parcel of land on its behalf, upon payment of compensation.

    3. Respondent No.2/DJB is directed to take necessary steps to forward its request to the respondent No.3/Govt. of NCT of Delhi for acquiring the subject parcel of land within a period of two weeks from today, whereafter the Govt. of NCT of Delhi shall process the application received from the respondent No.2/DJB in accordance with law as expeditiously as is possible.

    4. The petition is disposed of."

2. Clearly, the operative direction in the order dated 17 May 2012 was only for Delhi Jal Board (DJB) to forward the requisition to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to acquire the land forming subject matter of controversy, admeasuring 2 Bighas 12 Biswas situated in Khasra No.590/55/1 and 592/55/2 and, thereafter, for the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to process the application received from the DJB in accordance with the law as expeditiously as possible.

3. There has, no doubt, been considerable delay by DJB in forwarding its request to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi. However, the request was ultimately forwarded and, as per a list of dates provided by Mr. Sanjay Pathak, learned Counsel for the respondents, the requisition from the Land & Building Department of the GNCTD was received on 31 August 2023.

4. Mr. Pathak submits that, as per the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2013 LA Act") once a requisition for acquiring land for a public purpose is obtained, there has to be a joint survey of the land conducted whereafter social impact assessment of the land has also to be conducted in accordance with Section 4 of the 2013 LA Act.

5. Section 5 of the LA Act 2013 also requires a public hearing to be granted for the social impact assessment.

6. Mr. Pathak has handed over a list of dates which indicates that, after the second survey of the land using the TSM mode was conducted on 19 September 2023,

(i) bids for conducting social impact assessment were invited on 7 November 2023,

(ii) on 23 November 2023 the Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA) was declared as L-1,

(iii) on 30 November 2023, the DJB was informed about the declaring of the IIPA as L-1 and requested to deposit the bidding amount in the account of the Land & Building Department,

(iv) on 7 December 2023, demarcation survey was su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top