SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
GITA MITTAL
Filmistan Exhibitors Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
N.C.T., Delhi, Thr. Secy. Labour – Respondent


JUDGMENT

GITA MITTAL, J.

1. By this writ petition the petitioner has impugned an order dated 4th September, 2001 passed by the Controller under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and the order dated 30th June, 2004 passed by the Appellate Authority confirming the same.

2. Shri Vijay Kumar Churiwala (Respondent No. 2 herein) filed a claim against M/s Filmistan Exhibitors Ltd., petitioner before this court under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 alleging that he was employed with the petitioner since December, 1963 and he worked continuously till 30th October, 2000. He claimed that on this date, the petitioner refused duty to him and thereby his services were terminated after a continuous employment of nearly 37 years. As the petitioner refused to pay gratuity amount payable to the respondent no. 2 under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, he served a notice dated 25th January, 2001 by registered post as well as under postal certificate. The petitioner did not deny the assertions made in the notice by any reply, yet failed to comply with the notice demand.

In these circumstances, the respondent no. 2 claims to have sent an application for payment of the gratuity on 23rd February, 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top