IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
KRBL Limited - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13-1 - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14974 of 2022 and CM Appl. 46176 of 2022
Decided On : 28-10-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to tax refund after itat order (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. compliance with appeal effect orders required (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's directive for refund and interest payments (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 46176/2022 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.14974/2022
1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect order pursuant to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`ITAT') order dated 09th May, 2022 as well as to issue refund of Rs.38,35,24,882/- along with up-to-date interest and issue interest of Rs.1,26,30,272/-, after giving effect to order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [`CIT(A)'] for the Assessment Year 2014-15, as additional amount due to the Petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT vide order dated 09th May, 2022, decided all issues in favour of the Petitioner and the entire additions were deleted, thus allowing the appeal of the Petitioner and dismissing the appeal of the Respondents. She states that the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of remaining taxes paid under protest amounting to Rs.38,35,24,882/- along with applicable interest under Sections 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has filed letters dated 20th May, 2022 and 11th July, 2022 with the Respondents for passing of an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order and also for release of refunds legally due to the Petitioner, but to no avail. She submits that non-issuance of refund is in violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of India and also against Sections 237 and 240 of the Act.
4. Issue notice. Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Revenue is in the process of filing an appeal against the order of the ITAT.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Respondents-Revenue have had sufficient time to file an appeal against the order of the ITAT. In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing the appeal order.
6. Keeping in view the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents-Revenue to consider:
(i) Issue of refund of Rs.38,35,24,882/- along with up-to-date interest to the Petitioner; and
(ii) Issue of interest of Rs.1,26,30,272/- after giving effect to order of CIT(A) as additional amount due to the Petitioner.
7. The necessary appeal effect orders and payments of refunds shall be made within a period of six weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
The Court mandated the issuance of tax refunds and appeal effect orders according to the ITAT ruling, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance within stipulated periods.
Tax authorities must issue refunds due based on favorable ITAT orders within statutory deadlines, ensuring adherence to constitutional mandates regarding the issuance of refunds.
Tax authorities are mandated to process refunds and pass appeal effect orders within specified timelines, with delays constituting a violation of constitutional rights.
The court held that the Revenue must issue a tax refund following favorable ITAT rulings, emphasizing performance within statutory timelines to comply with legal obligations.
Timely compliance with statutory refund orders is imperative to protect taxpayer rights under the Income Tax Act and the Constitution.
Tax authorities are obligated to comply with statutory requirements regarding tax refunds, and failure to do so may contravene constitutional provisions.
The court affirmed the Respondents' obligation to act promptly on ITAT orders regarding refunds and applicable interest under the Income Tax Act.
Tax authorities are required to process refunds promptly as per binding orders from appellate authorities, emphasizing the significance of timely compliance with tax regulations.
Timely issuance of refunds as per the Income Tax Act is mandatory to prevent financial prejudice to the taxpayer, emphasizing the obligation of tax authorities to comply with tribunal orders.
A tribunal's unappealed order is final and mandates compliance, including refunding tax amounts per statutory provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.