Subhash Chand Jain vs Savita Devi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Subhash Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Savita Devi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellate review of trial court decree. (Para 1)
2. appellants' undertaking regarding possession and rent. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's directive to protect respondents from harassment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. disposal of appeal based on terms set. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

1. Present appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 04.12.2021, whereby two applications, one under Order 39 Rule 10 CPC and the other under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, filed by the Plaintiffs before the Trial Court, have been allowed and the Trial Court has decreed the suit in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants, on instructions from Appellant No. 1, who is present in Court albeit through video conferencing, submits that Appellants shall hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the suit property to the Respondents on or before 20.03.2023. Appellants also undertake that all the arrears of rent, payable to the Respondents, commencing from May, 2019 till date shall be paid within a period of two months from today. Insofar as the rent for the period 21.12.2022 till 20.03.2023 is concerned, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document