SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 131

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J.
Parvez - Appellant
Versus
State of Nct of Delhi & anr. - Respondents
CRL.A. 394 of 2025
Decided On : 28-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Indira Goswami, Ms. Anamika, Ms. Nirmala and Ms. Poonam, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Ms. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with Ms. Mansi Sharma, Advocate.

The court condoned a 9-day delay in filing an appeal under the Limitation Act, emphasizing justice and admitted the appeal against conviction under IPC and POCSO Act.

Headnote:(A) Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 - POCSO Act - Section 10 - Indian Penal Code - Section 354 - Delay in filing appeal - Application for condonation of delay of 9 days allowed in the interest of justice - Conviction under IPC and POCSO Act upheld with sentences of rigorous imprisonment and fines imposed - Compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- recommended for the survivor. (Paras 3, 9)

(B) Appeal - Scope of appeal - The court admits the appeal and directs the requisition of trial court records for review. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted under Sections 354 of the IPC and 10 of the POCSO Act, sentenced to 5 years and 3 years of rigorous imprisonment respectively, along with fines and recommended compensation for the survivor.

Findings of Court:
The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for further proceedings.

Issues: The main issues included the condonation of delay in filing the appeal and the validity of the conviction under the IPC and POCSO Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of justice in allowing the delay and the necessity of reviewing the conviction based on trial court records.

Result: Appeal admitted.

ORDER :

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

CRL. M.A. 9518/2025 (Exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

CRL. M.A. 9519/2025 (Delay 9 days)

3. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeks condonation of delay 9 days in filing the present appeal.

4. Issue notice.

5. Learned APP for the State accepts notice, and fairly does not oppose this application.

6. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

7. The delay of 9 days in filing of the captioned appeal is condoned.

8. The present appeal under Section 415(2) of the BNSS has been filed assailing the judgment of conviction dated 27.01.2025 and order on sentence dated 10.02.2025, passed by learned ASJ-01, Special Judge (POCSO), Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant has been convicted, in case SC No. 224/2021, arising out of FIR No. 437/2021, under Sections 354 of the IPC and Section 10 of the POCSO Act, registered at P.S. Harsh Vihar.

9. Vide the aforesaid impugned judgment of conviction and order on sentence, the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the IPC and Section 10 of the POCSO Act and has been sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years for the offence punishable under Section 10 of the POCSO Act, along with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further simple imprisonment for a period of one month. The appellant has also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the IPC along with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further simple imprisonment for one month. Learned ASJ had also recommended that compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- be awarded to the survivor in accordance with the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, 2018, by DLSA, Shahdara, Karkardooma, Delhi.

10. Admit.

11. Registry is directed to requisition the Trial Court Record with proper index, pagination and bookmarks, for perusal of this Court, before the next date of hearing.

12. In the meantime, a report be called from the Secretary, Delhi Legal Services Authority, Shahdara, Karkardooma, Delhi, before the next date of hearing, with regard to the status of disbursal of the compensation amount of Rs.1,50,000/- awarded to the survivor vide order on sentence dated 10.02.2025.

CRL. M. (BAIL) 686/2025

13. The present application under Section 538 of the BNSS seeks suspension of sentence and release of the appellant on bail during pendency of the instant appeal.

14. Issue notice.

15. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and seeks time to file status report. Let the same be filed before the next date of hearing.

16. Issue notice to the survivor to be served through the SHO concerned for the next date of hearing.

17. List on 21.05.2025.

18. In the meantime, the latest nominal roll of the appellant/applicant be requisitioned from the concerned Jail Superintendent.

19. Copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent and Secretary, DLSA, Shahdara, Karkardooma, for necessary information and compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top