SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 219

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
Naseem @ Imran - Appellant
Versus
State GNCT of Delhi - Respondent
CRL.A. 409 of 2025
Decided On : 01-04-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anil Basoya and Mr. Akash Gahlot, Advocates with Petitioner in person.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Ld. APP with W/PSI Neha P.S. Mehrauli.

The court suspended the execution of a two-year sentence under the POCSO Act pending appeal, emphasizing the importance of the Petitioner’s bail status and compliance with conditions.

Headnote:(A) POCSO Act - Sections 11 and 12 - Suspension of Execution of Sentence - The Petitioner was awarded a punishment of RI for two years under the POCSO Act, along with a fine of Rs.5,000/-; failure to pay the fine resulted in additional imprisonment. The Petitioner has been on bail throughout the trial and after conviction. The court suspended the sentence pending the appeal, subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond and maintaining communication availability. (Paras 3-5)

(B) Appeal - The appeal challenges the judgment dated 23.12.2024, with notice served to the Prosecutrix and E-TCR summoned for the next hearing. (Paras 7-10)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner was convicted under the POCSO Act and sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The Petitioner has been on bail during the trial and post-conviction.

Findings of Court:
The sentence is suspended until the appeal is resolved, with conditions imposed for the Petitioner’s release.

Issues: The main issue was whether the execution of the sentence should be suspended pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the Petitioner’s continued bail status and compliance with conditions warranted the suspension of the sentence during the appeal process.

Result: Sentence suspended pending appeal.

ORDER :

CRL. M.A. 9767/2025 (Seeking Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The Application stands disposed of.

CRL. M. (BAIL) 703/2025 (under Section 430(1) of BNSS, 2023 for Suspension of Execution of Sentence)

3. An Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking Suspension of Execution of Sentence pronounced vide Judgment/Order on Sentence dated 01.03.2025, whereby the Petitioner has been awarded a punishment of RI for two years in offence under Section 12 read with Section 11 of POCSO Act along with fine of Rs.5,000/- failing in payment of fine further imprisonment of three months, SI for two years for the payment of fine further imprisonment of three months and SI for one month failing in payment of fine further imprisonment of one week.

4. The maximum sentence awarded to the Petitioner is two years. The Petitioner has been on Bail throughout the trial and even after the conviction.

5. In view of the aforesaid, the sentence of the Petitioner is suspended, till the pendency of the Petition, subject to the following conditions:-

a) The Petitioner/accused shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate and further subject to the condition that the Petitioner/accused and the surety of the Petitioner, will keep his mobile phone in active mode during the period of suspension of sentence so that if required the Petitioner /accused may be contacted.

b) In case of change of residential address and/or mobile phone number, the same will be intimated to this Court, by way of an affidavit.

c) If the Petitioner/accused travel abroad, he shall submit itinerary with his address, at the time of contact, before the trial court.

6. The Application is disposed of accordingly.

CRL. A. 409/2025

7. An Appeal under Section 415(2) of BNSS has been filed challenging the impugned Judgment dated 23.12.2024 passed by learned ASJ.

8. Learned APP for the State appears on advance Notice.

9. Notice of the Appeal be served upon the Prosecutrix on taking steps by the Petitioner, to be served through I.O for the next date of hearing.

10. E-TCR be summoned for the next date of hearing.

11. List for arguments on 01.09.2025.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top