Rajasthan Housing Board VS Ajay Phatak

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR
Rajasthan Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Phatak – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ankit Acharya, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Devendra Mohan Mathur, Advocate with Respondent in person

ORDER

The present Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), filed by Rajasthan Housing Board (hereinafter referred to as “the Housing Board”) and its Deputy Housing Commissioner, the Opposite Parties in the Complaint under the Act, is directed against the Order dated 28.10.2014, passed by the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Jaipur (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No. 1381 of 2009. By the impugned Order, while affirming the Order dated 21.08.2009, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jaipur (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint Case No. 135/2008 (173/2006 Second), the State Commission has dismissed the Appeal, preferred by the Housing Board.

2. Vide Order dated 21.08.2009, the District Forum had allowed the Complaint, preferred by the Respondent/Complainant, and directed the Housing Board to allot to the Complainant an HIG house under its Mansarovar Yojana, according to the size and cost prescribed under the Self-Financing Scheme, 2005 (First Part), within three months. The District Forum had also directed the Housing Board to pay to the Compla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document