Back
A. P. SAHI, INDER JIT SINGH
Indore Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Rachna Mantri – Respondent
ORDER
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 08.02.2022 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 14 of 2014 in which order dated 25.09.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Indore (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 1255 of 2012 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 08.02.2022 of the State Commission.
2. While the Revision Petitioner was Appellant before the State Commission and Respondent No. 2 before the District Forum, Respondent No. 1 was Respondent No. 1 before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum and Respondent No. 2 was Respondent No. 2 before the State Commission and Respondent No. 1 before the District Forum.
3. Notice was issued to the Respondent(s) on 06.06.2022. Respondent No. 1 filed Written Arguments on 02.08.2024.
4. Brief facts of the case, as emerged from the RP, Order of the State Commission, Order of the Dis
“Change in layout plan of a housing scheme without intimation to allottees amounts to deficiency in service.”
Limited Jurisdiction – Commission’s revisional Jurisdiction is limited. Since there were concurrent findings of fact regarding the deficiency of service by both lower courts, and no jurisdictional er....
Consumer Commission retains jurisdiction over complaints despite IBC proceedings, affirming consumer rights in property allotment without requiring a physical allotment letter.
A subsequent allottee can claim an alternative plot if the original plot is embroiled in legal issues, validating consumer rights under the Consumer Protection Act.
(1) Powers – Powers of the National Commission are very limited.(2) Revisional jurisdiction – Only in a case where it is found that the State Commission has exercised its jurisdiction not vested in i....
(1) Incorporation of one-sided and unreasonable clauses in the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement constitutes an unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r).(2) Commission is competent to entertain and deci....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
