SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR
Basmati – Appellant
Versus
LIC of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Brijesh Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Kamal Mehta, Advocate

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Original Complainant under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the Order dated 05.11.2009, passed by the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Appeal No. 36/2009, preferred by Life Insurance Corporation of India, the Opposite Party/Respondent herein (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent/Insurance Company). By the Impugned Order, the State Commission while reversing the Order dated 23.12.2008, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Durg (hereinafter referred to as the District Commission) in Complaint Case No. 251/2007, filed by the Complainant/Petitioner, has disposed of the Appeal filed by the Respondent/Insurance Company, with a direction to the Respondent/Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Complainant/Petitioner herein as compensation for the deficiency in service committed by it in not deciding the claim in time and thereby compelling the Complainant/Petitioner to re-approach the District Commission as also Rs.500/- as costs. By its Order dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top