R. K. AGRAWAL
Adobe Marketing Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation – Respondent
ORDER
The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 read with Section 12(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by M/s. Adobe Marketing Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) against Opposite Parties, Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation and Ors. (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party Corporation), seeking either allotment of the alternative plot/plots or refund of the amount paid towards purchase of Plot(s)alongwith interest as the Opposite Party Corporation failed to develop the area where the Plots were allotted to the Complainant.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Complainant in order to establish an industry for self-employment and earning livelihood, applied for a fully developed industrial plot of 6000 sq. mtr. but on the assurance of the Opposite Party No. 3, Haryana Sahakari Vikas Pradhikaran (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party Authority), the Complainant agreed to take possession of six different plots instead of one. Accordingly, vide allotment letter dated 02.03.2009, the Complainant was allotted six Industrial Plot Nos. 32, 33 & 34 and 3
Common Cause, A Registered Society vs. Union of India and Ors.
Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni and Anr.
Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Abhishek Khanna and Ors.
Vodafone Idea Cellular Ltd. vs. Ajay Kumar Agarwal
Harsolia Motors vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Kavita Ahuja vs. Shipra Estates
Wg. Cdr. Arifur Rehman Khan and Areya Sultan and Ors. vs. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.