SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 471

M.R.CALLA, N.G.NANDI
D. G. DALAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ARUN D.OZA, G.M.JOSHI, GIRISH PATEL, HARSHA N.DEVANI, P.V.Hathi, Paresh Upadhyay, PERCY KAVINA, S.N.SHELAT

M. R. CALLA, J.

( 1 ) THROUGH these 16 Special Civil Applications, the petitioners have sought to challenge the allotment of posts made to the concerned respondents or no allotment and the method of allotment or assignment of preference in the Gujarat Civil Services and have sought a direction for allotment afresh or re-allotment on the vacant posts and for that purpose, Rule 9 of the Gujarat Civil Services Recruitment (Examination) Rules, 1980 has also been challenged in Special Civil Applications Nos. 931 of 1992, 5705 of 1996, and 3590 of 1990 to be ultra vires of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) IT may be mentioned that in Special Civil Applications Nos. 3597 of 1990, 5705 of 1996, 1662 of 1989 and 931 of 1992, there is no challenge to the allotment in favour of the concerned respondents, but the petitioners therein have claimed the post of their preference only.

( 3 ) DURING the course of hearing of these petitions on 29th June 2001, Mr. P. V. Hathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted a statement prepared on the basis of the instruction received from the respective petitioners whom he represents. As per this statement, the petitioner in Special






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top