H.K. Rathod, J.—Heard learned Advocate Ms. Sejal K. Mandavia appearing on behalf of petitioner in both the matters.

2. The draft amendment is placed on record in both the matters explaining the delay in filing both the petitions challenging the awards in question.

3. Accordingly, draft amendment is allowed with a direction to the petitioner to carry out the same within a period of two week from today. Accordingly, delay in filing both the petitions are condoned in the interest of justice.

4. It is necessary to note that in Special Civil Application No. 27731 of 2007, the award passed by Labour Court, Bharuch in Reference (LCB) No. 470 of 1990 dated 21.09.2003 is challenged by petitioner being a State Authority after a period of four years. In Special Civil Application No. 27731 of 2007, the name of respondent-workman is Raj Amarsinh Fulsinh. In Special Civil Application No. 27732 of 2007, the name of respondent-workman is Manilal Ratanji Vasava, where, Labour Court has decided the Reference (LCB) No. 270 of 1994 dated 15.05.1994, where, State Authority has taken time to challenge the award after a period of three years. Therefore, just to give identity to both the matters so,