ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Rajeshbhai Ramubhai Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. At the outset, learned advocate Mr. Suraj Matieda for learned advocate Mr. P. P. Majmudar for the respondents states at the bar that respondent No. 6 - Jagdishbhai Hirabhai Patel has expired. Accordingly, the appeal is abated qua respondent No. 6.
2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant - State under Section 378(1) (3) of the Criminal procedure Code, 1973 (Code) against the judgment and order dated 31.03.2016 passed in Special (Atrocity) Case No. 18 of 2015 by the learned 7th (Ad-hoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Bardoli, Dist.: Surat, recording the acquittal of the respondents - original accused for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 143, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the Atrocity Act").
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 26.12.2013, the respondents - accused allegedly took over the possession of the land belonged to Bhagubhai Chhitiyabhai Vasava, the complainant, and started a "Kola", a country made machine for manufacturing Jaggery and hence, the complainant asked them as to why th
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P.
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao v. State of A.P.
Gaya Din v. Hanuman Prasad (2001) 1 SCC 501
Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P (2008) 10 SCC 450
K. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P. (1979) 1 SCC 355
K. Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala (1999) 3 SCC 309
Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar (1970) 2 SCC 450
Kuldeep Singh v. Commissioner of Police (1999) 2 SCC 10
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1963 SC 200
Narendra Singh v. State of M.P (2004) 10 SCC 699
Perla Somasekhara Reddy v. State of A.P (2009) 16 SCC 98
Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Admn (1984) 4 SCC 635
Ram Singh v. State of H.P (2010) 2 SCC 445)
Ramesh Babulal Doshi v. State of Gujarat (1996) 9 SCC 225
S. Rama Krishna v. S. Rami Reddy (2008) 5 SCC 535
Sambasivan v. State of Kerala (1998) 5 SCC 412
Shailendra Pratap v. State of U.P (2003) 1 SCC 761
Shambhoo Missir v. State of Bihar (1990) 4 SCC 17
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran (2007) 3 SCC 755
State of Rajasthan v. Naresh (2009) 9 SCC 368
State of U.P. v. Banne (2009) 4 SCC 271
State of U.P. v. Ram Veer Singh (2007) 13 SCC 102
Surajpal Singh v. State AIR 1952 SC 52
Tulsiram Kanu v. State AIR 1954 SC 1
Point of law : Where the trial court allows itself to be beset with fanciful doubts, rejects creditworthy evidence for slender reasons and takes a view of the evidence which is but barely possible, i....
It is settled law that if main grounds on which lower Court has based its order acquitting accused are reasonable and plausible, and same cannot be entirely and effectively be dislodged or demolished....
It is well settled by catena of decisions that an appellate Court has full power to review, re-appreciate and consider the evidence upon which the order of acquittal is founded.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.