Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, R. T. VACHHANI
Atul Trikambhai Kanani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present group of petitions emanates from the Notification dated 30.09.2016 passed by the Legal Department compulsorily retiring the petitioners, who were serving as Judicial Officers in the State of Gujarat. The name of the respective petitioners’ figure at Sr. Nos.4, 3, and 1 of the Notification.
2. The facts of the petitioners are as under:-
| Sr. No. | Case No. | Date of Special Constituted Committee’s Report | Date of Chamber Meeting Decision | Date of the impugned Notification | Age of the petitioner at the time of the Notification | Date of Order on the Review Application | Remarks |
| 1 | SCA No.18969 of 2017 Mr.Atul Trikambhai Kanani | 01.04.2016 | 14.07.2016 | 30.09.2016 | 52 years, 8 months (Calculated as per D.O.B.) | N.A. | It was found that the grading for disposals were becoming poorer, from Adequate to Just Adequate to Poor especially in the last five years (Page No.39) |
| 2 | SCA No.21171 of 2017 Mr.Shakilah med Abdulsattar Shaikh | 01.04.2016 | 14.07.2016 | 30.09.2016 | 53 years, 3 months (Calculated as per D.O.B.) | N.A. | It was found that the grading for disposals were becoming poorer, from Adequate to Just Adequate to Poor especially in the last five years (Page No.54) |
| 3. | SCA No.21172 of 2017 |
Compulsory retirement of Judicial Officers can proceed based on performance assessment; requires no personal discretion from the Governor, acting under constitutional provisions and rules.
Compulsory retirement of judicial officers is lawful under administrative discretion, based on performance assessments, without necessitating a personal examination by the Governor.
The authority to retire a Judicial Officer lies with the Governor, acting on High Court recommendations, emphasizing the importance of performance and integrity in public interest retirement decision....
Compulsory retirement of judicial officers based on performance assessment is valid under administrative law; procedural adherence to Rules is crucial.
The court upheld the legitimacy of a judicial officer's premature retirement based on performance evaluation, emphasizing the absence of necessity for a hearing and the subjective satisfaction of the....
Compulsory retirement of judicial officers based on performance assessments is lawful; natural justice does not apply as such retirement is not punitive but serves public interest.
Compulsory retirement of judicial officers is lawful under Rule 21 of the Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005, based on performance assessment, with limited grounds for judicial review unless ....
Premature retirement of judicial officers can be sanctioned based on performance evaluations, and such decisions are typically not subject to judicial review unless tainted with malice or illegality.
Compulsory retirement of judicial officers requires robust evaluation of performance and integrity; procedural compliance ensures validity of notifications issued under the Governor's name.
Judicial officers can be prematurely retired based on poor performance evaluations, with no obligation to adhere to principles of natural justice, as emphasized by established precedents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
