N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Techi Kak S/o Shri Techi Mutie – Appellant
Versus
Taya Chumi D/o Shri Taya Tebi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
1. Heard Mr. Khoda Tama, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Mrinal Kumar Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. T.N. Srinivasan, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Ms. Topi Jini, learned Addl. P.P. Arunachal Pradesh, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2.
2. The present criminal revision petition has been so instituted presenting a challenge to an order, dated 09.01.2023, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Yupia, in Sessions Case No. 02/2021 corresponding to Banderdewa Police Station Case No. 22/2020, towards discharging the respondent No. 1, herein, Ms. Taya Chumi, from the case. The petitioner has also assailed the order, dated 09.01.2023, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Yupia, in IA (Crl.) 115/2022 in Sessions Case No. 02/2021, defreezing the bank account bearing A/c No. 916010074154305 of the said respondent No. 1 as maintained in the Axis Bank, Itanagar Branch, Itanagar.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 05.11.2020, at about 13.00 hours, the Officer-In-Charge, Banderdewa P.S. received telephonic information about an accident that took place near Karsingsa Block Point, in b
Anant Prakash Sinha @ Ananth Sinha v. State of Haryana & Ors. (2016) 6 SCC 105
Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Ghulam Hassan Beigh v. Mohammad Maoqbool Megrey & Ors. (2022) 12 SCC 657
Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2017) 6 SCC 1
M.E. Shivalingamurthy v. CBI, Bengaluru
P. Vijayan v. State of Kerala & Anr. (2010) 2 SCC 398
Sajjan Kumar v. Central Bank of India
State of NCT of Delhi v. Shiv Charan Bansal
Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr. (1979) 3 SCC 4
The court emphasized that at the charge framing stage, the prosecution's evidence must be accepted as true, and any grave suspicion of involvement in a conspiracy warrants further examination.
Criminal breach of trust and forgery by Bank officer – Mere depositing defalcated amount subsequently, does not exonerate accused/petitioner from charge of commission of offence which has been ultima....
The court emphasized that in matrimonial disputes, criminal charges must be supported by substantial evidence to avoid misuse of legal processes against family members.
Discharge of accused – Court is only to confined as to whether a prima facie case is made out or not – No defence on merits is to be considered at the time of framing charge and / or at stage of deci....
A discharge petition requires sufficient prima facie evidence; an absence in FIR or co-accused acquittals alone cannot substantiate discharge claims.
Criminal liability under Sections 420 IPC is negated by repayment of loans, indicating lack of wrongful loss to the bank.
The main legal point established is the requirement of grave suspicion to frame charges, the significance of tower locations and call detail records in establishing presence, and the importance of as....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.