SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 856

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.
ABDUL KHADER S/O MUHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 1186 of 2024
Decided On : 15-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : SIDHARTH O., ANWIN JOHN ANTONY, P.C. MOIDEEN, SUSANTH SHAJI, MOHAMMED ASIF P., ALBIN A. JOSEPH.
For the Respondent: SHEEBA THOMAS.

IMPORTANT POINT
The transition from the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to the BNSS does not affect the substantive right to appeal, and procedural amendments are applicable only to appeals filed after the new law's enactment.

Headnote:

APPEAL - Criminal Procedure - Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The court analyzed the transition from the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, focusing on the provisions regarding appeals. It highlighted that appeals filed after 01.07.2024 must adhere to the BNSS, while those filed before this date are governed by the Code of 1973. The court emphasized that the right to appeal is a substantive right, and procedural changes do not affect vested rights. The court concluded that the appeal filed on 10.07.2024 should have been filed under the BNSS, but allowed for amendments to correct the filing.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and filed an appeal on 10.07.2024. A question arose regarding whether the appeal should be governed by the Code of 1973 or the newly enacted Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which came into effect on 01.07.2024.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appeal filed on 10.07.2024 should have been filed under Section 415(2) of the BNSS. However, it ruled that the appeal does not need to be dismissed for being non-maintainable, allowing the appellant to amend the appeal to reflect the correct provisions.

Issues: Whether the appeal filed after the enactment of the BNSS should be governed by the provisions of the Code of 1973 or the BNSS, and the implications of procedural changes on substantive rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that appeals filed on or after 01.07.2024 must follow the BNSS, while those filed before this date are subject to the Code of 1973. The right to appeal is a substantive right that cannot be affected by procedural changes, and any amendments to correct the filing can be made.

Final Decision: The appeal filed on 10.07.2024 should be amended to comply with the provisions of the BNSS, but it is not dismissed as non-maintainable.

ORDER :

1. This is an appeal against conviction. The appellant invoked the provisions of Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Code of 1973, for short) to file the appeal. The appeal was filed on 10.07.2024. A question arises whether this appeal could be filed under the provisions of the Code of 1973 or should have been filed under the provisions of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS, for short). Section 415 of the BNSS is the provision corresponding to Section 374 of the Code of 1973.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the trial was held under the provisions of the Code of 1973, and therefore the appellant's right to appeal accrued as per the provisions of the Code of 1973. It is contended that the appellant cannot be compelled to invoke the provisions of the BNSS to file the appeal since the trial took place under the Code of 1973.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant invites my attention to Pylikunju and others v. State of Kerala and others, 1977 KLT 252 and also Hiralal Nansa Bhavsar and another v. State of Gujarat, 1976 Crl. LJ 84 in order to fortify his contention that in a case where the trial took place under the provisions of the Code of 1973, the appeal shall be filed and decided by the provisions of the Code of 1973 itself. It is the further submission of the learned counsel that the appeal being continuation of the trial, the appeal shall also be dealt with as per the same procedure under which the trial was held. In that regard, the learned counsel places reliance on Soban v. State of Kerala, 2021 (3) KHC 383.

4. The appellants herein were convicted as per the judgment dated 12.06.2024. Needless to say that the trial and conviction were as per the provisions of the Code of 1973. But the appeal was filed on 10.07.2024. If so, which provisions; whether Section 374(2) of the Code of 1973 or Section 415(2) of the BNSS that governs the appeal filed by the appellant? A similar question would arise when an application is filed in a pending appeal which was filed before 01.07.2024. This question has larger ramification since its answer delineates the procedure to be followed in the investigation, inquiry, trial, appeal and applications pending on 01.07.2024; whether the provisions of the Code of 1973 or the BNSS.

5. Sections 484(1) and (2)(a) of the Code of 1973, which are relevant to answer the aforementioned question, read:

    Section 484 - Repeal and savings:

(1) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898) is hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal:

(a) If, immediately before the date on which this Code comes into force, there is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the old Code), as if this Code had not come into force:

Provided that every inquiry under Chapter XVIII of the old Code, which is pending at the commencement of this Code, shall be dealt with and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of this Code.

(b) xxxx

(c) xxxx

(d) xxxx

(3) xxxx

6. The corresponding provision in the BNSS is Section 531. Sub-sections (1) and (2)(a) of Section 531 read as follows:

    Section 531 - Repeal and savings:

(1) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal:

(a) if, immediately before the date on which this Sanhita comes into force, there is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), as if this Sanhi

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top