Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
D.K. SINGH
Roshith, S/o.Ramakrishnan.K.P. (Late) – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Kannur University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The learned Counsel for the petitioners in these writ petitions submit that they would like to withdraw these writ petitions as it have been rendered infructuous, as the matter got settled between the parties and nothing survives for this Court to adjudicate in these writ petitions.
Taking the said statement of the learned Counsel for the petitioners on record, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties may withdraw writ petitions when disputes are settled, leading to dismissal as infructuous.
Withdrawal of writ petition granted, with liberty for future proceedings based on emerging circumstances.
A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn when parties settle their dispute and petitioner seeks permission.
Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible upon the resolution of the matter out of court, showcasing judicial discretion.
The court allows withdrawal of writ petitions under Article 226 where parties settle their disputes out of court.
A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn when the parties reach a settlement.
Writ petition dismissed due to becoming infructuous owing to subsequent developments.
Settlement between parties renders writ petition infructuous, leading to dismissal.
Writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous where the matters in question are no longer relevant.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous due to absence of a live issue.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
