Pooja Gurjar D/o Nandaram Gurjar vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1394

ARUN BHANSALI, PANKAJ BHANDARI
Pooja Gurjar D/o Nandaram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Biri Singh Sinsinwar, Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Dhruv Atrey, N.N. Meena, A.K. Gupta, Rinesh Gupta, Gaurav Sharma, Anoop Meena, Saurabh Pratap Singh, V.R. Bajwa, Savita Nathawal, Rajeev Surana, Sankalp Sogani, Muskan Verma, Umang Jain, Pankaj Gupta, Naman Yadav, Saurabh Yadav, Hemang Singh Sinsinwar, Yogendra Singh, Sanjay Mehla, Sunita Mehla, Nagendra Sharma, Rajesh Sharma, Kapil Gupta, Adarsh Singhal, Ajay Gadwal, Manish Gupta, Kapil Prakash Mathur, Sudesh Saini, Mohd. Zuber, Nikhil Sharma, S.S. Hora, Hemant Nahta, Shyam Bihari Gautam, Anshuman Saxena, Pankaj Agarwal, Mohit Sharma, N.P. Meena, Jitesh Jain, Timan Singh, Abhilash Sharma, Ashwani Chobisa, Sandeep Pathak, Dushyant Singh Naruka, Mritunjya Sharma, Anurag Mathur, Saurabh Jain, Rishu Jain, Pallav Jhalani, B.R. Rana, B.R. Choudhary, Pratush Choudhary, Shubham Khunteta, Harsh Joshi, Akshay Shekhawat, Abhishek B. Sharma, Dhananjay Singh Gokhar, Aziz Ahmed, Farooq Ahmed, Parmeshwar Pilania, D.V. Tholla, Himanshu Tholla, Rohitash Kr. Saini, Naman Yadav, Tapish Saraswat, Nitin Jain, Manish Kumar Sharma, P.C. Devanda, Mahendra Saini, Prashant Deora, Anish Badala, Anuraj Pareek, Vimal Kumar Jain, Naman Maheshwari.
For the Respondents: G.S. Rathore, Atul Sharma, Kirtivardhan Singh Rathore, Tayyab Ali, Prashant Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

PANKAJ BHANDARI, J.

1. In the present Criminal Reference the following question has been referred:

“Whether in all the bail applications under Sections 437, 438 or 439 Cr.P.C. the complainant/first informant/victim defined under Section 2(wa) of the Cr.P.C. is necessary party and necessarily be impleaded as party respondent?”

2. A Standing Order No. 32/S.O./2023 dated 15.09.2023 was issued by the Office of this Court whereby it was enjoined upon all concerned that in future, in all matters, arising out of criminal act committed against victim as defined under Section 2(wa) of Cr.P.C. the victim be necessarily impleaded as party-respondent. The aforesaid Standing Order was passed on the basis of observations made in order dated 08.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9490/2023 titled as Nitoo Singh @ Nitu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan that victim is necessary party in all the bail matters arising out of criminal act committed against the victim. Thereafter, learned Single Judge in order dated 27.09.2023 passed in Pooja Gurjar and Others vs. State of Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11910/2023

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1394

ARUN BHANSALI, PANKAJ BHANDARIPooja Gurjar D/o Nandaram Gurjar – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

ARUN BHANSALI, PANKAJ BHANDARI
Pooja Gurjar D/o Nandaram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent