VLS Finance Ltd vs State NCT Of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Del) 948

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA
VLS Finance Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Bharat Chugh, Mr.Jai Allagh, Mr.Maanish M. Choudhary, Mr.Ashok Kr. Sharma, Advs.
For the Respondent: Mr.Aman Usman, Mr.Vijay Agarwal, Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Mr.Jatin S.Sethi, Advs.

Table of Content
1. challenge to impugned order (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. right to be heard as victim (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
3. prosecutor's role vs victim's participation (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
4. boundaries of victim's rights (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
5. judicial discretion in revisions (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
6. regulation of victim's role (Para 51 , 52 , 53)
7. victim's right in the justice system (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
8. rights in criminal proceedings (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68)
9. legal interpretations of victim's role (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75)
10. authority and responsibility of public prosecutors (Para 76 , 77 , 78)
11. to be heard does not mean to be a party (Para 79)
12. conclusion - victim's rights and orders (Para 80 , 81 , 82 , 83)

JUDGMENT :

NAVIN CHAWLA, J.

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.P.C.’), challenging the Order dated 26.10.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’) passed by the learned Additional Sessio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Del) 948

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHINAVIN CHAWLAVLS Finance Ltd – AppellantVersusState NCT Of Delhi – Respondent

Cases Referred (21)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA
VLS Finance Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi – Respondent