SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 252

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR, J.
Gurdev Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
CRLMB 1626 of 2025
Decided On : 21-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.R. Godara, Mr. N.K. Gurjar, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP

Prolonged pre-trial detention without sufficient progress in trial proceedings can justify the granting of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8/21, 25, 29 - Bail application - Petitioner arrested for possession of contraband; arguments presented regarding false implication and delay in trial - Petitioner in custody for over 1 year 5 months, with only 2 out of 14 witnesses examined - Court allows bail application, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial. (Paras 1-9)

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail include duration of custody and pace of trial - Delay in trial not attributable to the petitioner; bail granted with conditions. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested for offences under the NDPS Act after contraband was recovered from a vehicle he was driving. The petitioner claims false implication and highlights the slow pace of the trial.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the significant delay in the trial and that only 2 of 14 witnesses had been examined.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the prolonged incarceration and trial delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the prolonged custody without trial justifies the granting of bail, emphasizing the importance of a timely trial.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C . (483 BNSS) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.283/2023 registered at Police Station Sri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar, for offences under Sections 8/21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel submitted that as per the prosecution, acting on a secret information, on 23.09.2023, a team of Police Station Sri Vijaynagar apprehended a Hundai Verna Car having registration No.DL-3C-BP-7865 which was being driven by the present petitioner and the co-accused Jagroop and Gurpreet Singh were also accompanying him. On a search of the offending vehicle being made, contraband (smack/chitta) weighing 280 gms. was recovered. The petitioner as well as the co-accused were arrested on the spot.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 23.09.2023. He further submitted that till date, out of total 14 cited prosecution witnesses, only 2 prosecution witnesses have been examined before competent Criminal Court. He further submitted that the delay in trial is not at all attributable to the petitioner. He submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since last more than 1 year 5 months and looking to the pace at which trial is being conducted against the present petitioner, the same is not likely to be concluded in near future.

4. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the cases of Rabi Prakash Vs. State of Orisa (Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.4169/2023 and Mohd Muslim @ Hussain Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(s).915 of 2023. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents.

5. On these grounds, he implored the Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner is facing trial for the offence under the NDPS Act and, therefore, the present bail application deserves to be rejected straightway. Learned Public Prosecutor, however, was not in position to refute the fact that in last more than 1 year 5 months, out of total 14 cited prosecution witnesses, only 2 prosecution witnesses have been examined till date.

7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

8. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the petitioner has suffered incarceration for last more than 1 year 5 months and out of total 14 cited prosecution witnesses, only 2 prosecution witnesses have been examined till date, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

9. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C .(483 BNSS) is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioner- Gurdev Singh S/o Shri Hardyal Singh shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No.283/2023 registered at Police Station Sri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to so.

10. In case, the petitioner remains absent on any date of hearing or makes an attempt to delay the trial by seeking unnecessary adjournments, it shall be taken as a misuse of concession of bail granted to him by this Court. The prosecution, in such a situation, shall be at liberty to move an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner today by this Court It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top