SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 271

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. C.S. Rajpurohit, Mr. S.R. Godara, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

Order :

1. These applications for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.83/2021 registered at Police Station Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar, for offences under Sections 8/22, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel submitted that as per the prosecution, during routine nakabandi, on 03.04.2021, a team of Police Station Raisinghnagar signaled a Motorcycle having registration No.RJ-13- DS-9436 to stop on which the co-accused- Vikram Kumar was a pillion rider and was carrying a sack on his shoulder. Being suspicious of his activities, a search of the said sack was being made by the police team and they recovered psychotropic substance (25000 tablets of Tramadol) weighing 9.400 Kgs packed in total 100 boxes from the conscious possession of the co- accused- Vikram Kumar. As per the prosecution, the petitioner Vinod Kumar fled away from the scene.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submitted that co-accused Vikram Kumar (S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.11847/2024) from whose conscious possession, the psycho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top