SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 761

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Adarsh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP

JUDGMENT :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his natural guardian) as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Sections 333, 87, 305-A and 3(5) of BNS. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 before learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Hanumangarh was rejected vide order dated 16.12.2024. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Special Judge, Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005, District Hanumangarh and the same has been dismissed by learned Appellate Court vide impugned order dated 20.12.2024.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 16.12.2024 and 20.12.2024 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. Furthermore, there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail, then his release is likely to bring him into association

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top