TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Prakash Chand – Appellant
Versus
Durga Singh – Respondent
Based on the provided legal document, there is no indication that the plaint was explicitly rejected in the judgment. The document primarily discusses issues related to the dismissal of objections under Section 47 read with Order 21 Rules 97 and 101 of the CPC, the obligation of the court to frame issues before dismissing objections, and the conduct of the parties involved in the proceedings. The focus is on the execution of the eviction order and the conduct of the litigants, rather than on the rejection or acceptance of a plaint. Therefore, it can be inferred that the judgment does not specifically reject the plaint but rather addresses the procedural and substantive issues arising during the execution process. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
1. By the medium of this petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India, the following reliefs have been prayed:
“(i) To call for the record of the case pertaining to execution petition No.55-1 of 2015/11 pending before the Ld-Rent Controller Court No-IV Shimla, HP titled as Durga Singh vs. Sukhdev and after examining the legality and propriety of the impugned order annexure P-5 to quash and set aside the same.
(b) To directing the executing court to decide the objections annexure P-4 in accordance with law after framing the issues and giving opportunity of evidence.”
2. The necessary facts leading to the filing of the instant petition are that respondent/ decree holder had filed an application for eviction against the proforma respondent Sukhdev Sharma with respect to the premises known as Set No.1, Upper Floor House, Cart Road, Ram Singh House, Shimla. The grounds on which the eviction was sought;
(i) arrears of rent and
(ii) sub letting the premises in favour of petitioners.
3. The proforma respondent did not choose to contest the proceedings and was thus proceeded ex-parte and finally orders of eviction came to be passed on 8.12.1986.
4. On c
Abhyudya Sanstha v. Union of India & Ors. (2011) 6 SCC 145
Amar Singh v. Union of India & Ors. (2011) 7 SCC 69
Buddhi Kota Subbarao (Dr.) v. K. Parasaran
Babu Lal Vs. M/s Hazari Lal Kishori Lal & Ors. (1982) 1 SCC 525
Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma
Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors. (2010) 2 SCC 114
Gayatri Devi & Ors. Vs. Shashi Pal Singh
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India and others
K.K. Modi vs. K.N. Modi and others
Kishore Samrite vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Kalyaneshwari v. Union of India & Anr. (2011) 3 SCC 287
Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeria
Marshall Sons & Co. (I) Ltd. Vs. Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd & Anr. (1999) 2 SCC 325
P.S.R. Sadhanantham v. Arunachalam & Anr. (1980) 3 SCC 141
Padmawati vs Harijan Sewak Sangh
Pushpa Devi Bhagat Vs. Rajinder Singh & Ors. (2006) 5 SCC 566
Ranipet Municipality Rep. by its.... Vs. M. Shamsheerkhan
Ramrameshwari Devi and others Vs. Nirmala Devi and others
Rajappa Hanamantha Ranoji Vs. Mahadev Channabasappa & Ors. (2000) 6 SCC 120
Satyender Singh Vs. Gulab Singh
Ravinder Kaur Vs. Ashok Kumar & Anr. (2003) 8 SCC 289
Shub Karan Bubna alias Shub Karan Prasad Bubna Vs. Sita Saran Bubna & Ors. (2009) 9 SCC 689
Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd Vs. Kavita P. Lalwani
State of Uttaranchal v Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors. (2010) 3 SCC 402
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr. (2011) 7 SCC 639
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. (2003) 8 SCC 648
Smt. Jamilabai Abdul Kadar v. Shankarlal Gulabchand
Satyawati Vs. Rajinder Singh & Anr. (2013) 9 SCC 491
Tilokchand H.B. Motichand & Ors. v. Munshi & Anr. 1969 (1) SCC 110
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.