IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Deepika - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others - Respondents
CWP No. 9538 of 2024
Decided On : 17-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jbt recruitment process with district allotment per merit and preferences. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. meritorious reserved candidates shifted to general category merit list. (Para 7) |
| 3. reserved candidates with superior merit qualify for general vacancies. (Para 8) |
| 4. ramesh ram allows mrc migration to retain preferred service allocations. (Para 9) |
| 5. district postings analogous to services; protect mrc preferences post-shift. (Para 10) |
| 6. direct preferred district allotment; mandate future procedural guidelines. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Petitioner emerged as meritorious candidate belonging to the reserved category. She had exercised option for appointment in districts as per her order of preference in accordance with law. Based upon her merit, respondents shifted the petitioner from reserved category to General category. Petitioner’s placement in the general category was not at higher pedestal. As a consequence thereof, the petitioner lost out on getting appointed in District Solan as per her preferred first option. It is against this background that the petitioner has instituted the present writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to allot her preferred district keeping in view her order of preference with all consequential benefits of seniority etc.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the case file.
3. The case
3(i). Petitioner completed Junior Basic Trained (JBT) Teacher training and got her name registered in the concerned employment exchange. This was in view of provision existing in the Recruitment & Promotion Rules for the post of JBT Teacher for making batch-wise recruitment alongwith other modes of recruitment.
3(ii). Respondent-Education Department issued an office letter/notification on 11.10.2023 to all concerned Deputy Directors of Elementary Education in the State on the subject of filling up of vacant posts of JBTs, inter alia, on batch-wise basis. In terms of the said office letter/notification, total 1161 posts of JBT Teachers were notified to be filled-up district wise. 108 posts were meant to be filled up in District Solan, out of which, 37 were meant for General category and 21 for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste category. The candidates, who were eligible for the posts to be filled up on batch-wise basis, were to appear for counselling in their home districts. As per the terms & conditions of the aforesaid office letter, ‘the candidates shall be allotted District as per his/her rank in the overall merit list read with the order of preference of the candidates. The allotted District will be displayed on the website of DEE. Merely listing of name in the shortlist drawn at District level or overall merit list drawn at Directorate level does not confer any right to the candidate for posting. The appointment shall be made after verification of documents in support of the eligibility criteria. The draft of the appointment letter shall be uniform throughout the State and the specimen shall be shared by the Directorate shortly. The Principal/Headmaster concerned shall take the joining after verification of documents.’
The above was a categoric condition that the candidate was to be allotted the district as per his rank in the overall merit list read with the order of his preference.
3(iii). Petitioner being eligible for batch-wise recruitment as JBT Teacher, submitted her application as a Scheduled Caste category candidate. In her application form, she exercised her preference for districts in the following order:-
“1. Solan
2. Shimla
3. Sirmour
4. Bilaspur
5. Kangra
6. Una
7. Hamirpur
8. Mandi
9. Kullu
10. Chamba
11. Kinnaur
12. Lahaul & Spiti.”
3(iv). Petitioner was called for interview by the respondent-Department. The result of the interview was declared on 27.08.2024. Petitioner was declared successful and placed at merit rank 450 in the consolidated merit list. She, however, was not allotted her first preference of District Solan, rather, was allot
Sadhana Singh Dangi v. Pinki Asati
Union of India Versus Ramesh Ram and others
Anurag Patel v. U.P. Public Service Commission
Meritorious reserved category candidates shifted to general category retain entitlement to preferred district allotment as per reserved merit position to prevent disadvantage from higher performance.
A candidate belonging to a reserved category, if selected under the General/Open Category, is entitled to be considered for posting as per his or her preference on the basis of his or her merit among....
The allocation of postings must be fair, transparent, and based on established merit principles, ensuring that no employee is arbitrarily deprived of their rightful position.
Reservation policies in public employment must prioritize merit; candidates from reserved categories who qualify for general positions based on merit are to be treated as general category candidates.
It is well-established that an authority cannot make any selection/appointment beyond the number of posts advertised, even if there were a larger number of posts available than those advertised.
Reservation – Merit must be given precedence and if candidates, who belong to SCs, STs and OBCs have secured higher marks or are more meritorious, they must be considered against seats meant for unre....
Merit-based allocation must not disadvantage more meritorious candidates from reserved categories, as established in Supreme Court precedents.
Candidates securing higher marks than unreserved category cannot claim reservation benefits unless explicitly provided by state policy; constitutional provisions require formal policy to confer reser....
Reserved category candidates who score above the general category cut-off must be treated as general candidates, ensuring merit prevails in recruitment processes as mandated by the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.