IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR, J.
Preeti Kumari W/o- Nikesh Kumar- Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Another – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11252 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11508 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12106 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12142 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12213 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12219 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12262 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12306 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12686 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12711 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12743 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12752 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12862 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12868 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12964 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12980 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13022 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13048 of 2025
Decided on : 30-8-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of lead cases and approach to hearing. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of appointment and selection process for head teachers. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discontent among candidates regarding district allotment. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. arguments against the lack of statutory basis for postings. (Para 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. state's justification for district allocation and methodology. (Para 20 , 21 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. judicial observation on rights concerning posting. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. principles of fairness and justice in employment. (Para 30 , 32 , 34) |
| 8. ruling on merit-based postings and state obligations. (Para 37 , 45) |
| 9. direction for addressing grievances on district postings. (Para 46) |
| 10. final directives and disposal of writ petitions. (Para 49 , 51) |
JUDGMENT :
JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR, J.
Date : 30-08-2025 Heard the learned Advocates for the petitioners and the learned Advocates for the respondents.
2. In the bunch of the writ petitions, there are two sets of writ petitions; one set of teachers are ‘Head Teachers’ and another set of teachers are ‘Head Masters’. Since the issue(s) in these writ petitions are one and identical, with the consent of the parties, all these writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed off by a common order.
3. For the appreciation, the facts narrated in C.W.J.C.No.11252 of 2025, which deals with the case of Head Teachers and in relation to Head Masters in C.W.J.C. No.12219 of 2025 shall be treated as lead case whereas the counter affidavit filed in the afore-noted C.W.J.C. No.11252 of 2025 duly sworn by the Joint Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar shall be treated as response to all the writ petitions, since the stand of the State is one and identical in all the cases.
4. The 1st set of Teachers were appointed as Head Teachers in primary and elementary schools, pursuant to the examinations conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission (for short ‘the BPSC’) under the Advertisement No. 25/2024. Their appointments are governed by the Bihar Elementary Schools Head Teachers Rules, 2024. Similarly the 2nd set of Teachers were appointed as Head Master in Higher/Senior Secondary Schools, pursuant to the Advertisement No.26/2024 duly conducted by the BPSC in terms with Bihar State School Teacher (Appointment, Transfer, Disciplinary Proceedings and Service Conditions) Rules, 2023.
5. Based upon the performance of the candidates, in the process of selection undertaken by the BPSC, a merit list in respect of the candidates were prepared, on being found them successful. While the exercise of counselling and the verification of the credentials were in process, in the meanwhile, on 02.01.2025, the Director, Primary Education, issued letter to all the District Education Officers across the State of Bihar instructing them that all the successful candidates for the post of Head Teachers must submit three districts preferences through the e-ShikshaKosh portal. The letter made it clear that the district allotment would be carried out on the principle of merit-cum-choice; and if a candidate could not be allotted anyone of the districts of their choice based on merit, the nearest available district from their preferences would be assigned on an administrative standpoint. In pursuant to the letter, all the successful candidates, including the petitioners, who were selected as Head Teachers submitted their district preferences through online, as instructed.
6. On 03.04.2025, the Director, Primary Education, issued a further order disclosing that altogher 35,386 Head Teacher candidates were submitted online preferences, out of which 35,333 online requests were verified. Based on these verified preferences, districts were allotted to those 35,333 candidates.
7. Some of the candidates, on being aggrieved with their non-allocation of preferential posting, preferred C.W.J.C. No.16614 of 2025 before this Court challenging the district allotment made pursuant to the orders dated 02.01.202
Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and Ors
Dipak Babaria and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. [
Ritesh R. Sah v. Y.L. Yamul (Dr)
Tripurari Sharan v. Ranjit Kumar Yadav
Som Prakash Rekhi Vs. The Union of India & Anr.,
Balram Gupta v. Union of India and Another
Bhupendra Nath Hazarika and Another vs. State of Assam and Others
The allocation of postings must be fair, transparent, and based on established merit principles, ensuring that no employee is arbitrarily deprived of their rightful position.
Meritorious reserved category candidates shifted to general category retain entitlement to preferred district allotment as per reserved merit position to prevent disadvantage from higher performance.
A candidate belonging to a reserved category, if selected under the General/Open Category, is entitled to be considered for posting as per his or her preference on the basis of his or her merit among....
The circular issued by the Board of Basic Education allowing candidates from zero vacancy districts to participate in the selection process for the post of Assistant Teachers was valid as it was in c....
It is well-established that an authority cannot make any selection/appointment beyond the number of posts advertised, even if there were a larger number of posts available than those advertised.
Appointments for Grade III Teachers must reflect accurate merit while adhering to court directives on recruitment processes, ensuring transparency and fairness in selections.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.