SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR, J.
Preeti Kumari W/o- Nikesh Kumar- Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Another – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11252 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11508 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12106 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12142 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12213 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12219 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12262 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12306 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12686 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12711 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12743 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12752 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12862 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12868 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12964 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12980 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13022 of 2025, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13048 of 2025
Decided on : 30-8-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Sr. Mr. Alok Abhinav, Mr. Gyan Prakash, Ms. Diksha Kumari, Ms. Shreyanshi Raj
For the Respondent: Mr. P. K. Shahi, General Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Ms. Yeritika K. Kashyap, AC to AG, Mr. Navnet Govindam, Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Ms. Supriya Kumar

The allocation of postings must be fair, transparent, and based on established merit principles, ensuring that no employee is arbitrarily deprived of their rightful position.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Elementary Schools Head Teachers Rules, 2024 - Bihar State School Teacher (Appointment, Transfer, Disciplinary Proceedings and Service Conditions) Rules, 2023 - The principle of merit-cum-choice in district allocation for Head Teachers and Head Masters was challenged. The absence of statutory rules for district preference allocation led the court to rule that such allocations must align with established legal standards and the rights of meritorious candidates must be respected. The State’s arbitrary allocation process was found unsustainable, mandating adherence to fair procedures. (Paras 10, 11, 25, 36)

(B) Legal Rights - Judicial pronouncements underline that an employee does not possess an absolute entitlement to a specific post allocation but the adopted method must uphold fairness and transparency, preventing arbitrary decisions. The principle of fair allocation based on merit must not only exist theoretically but be manifest in practice. (Paras 14, 25, 30, 36)

Facts of the case:
A group of teachers (Head Teachers and Head Masters) petitioned against the State's district allocation process which did not respect their merit-based preferences. They contended their placements were arbitrary and violated the merit-cum-choice principle. (Paras 10-20)

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the allocation process lacked adherence to statutory requirements, emphasizing the need for fair policy implementation that respects meritocracy. A directive was issued to reassess allocations while inviting objections based on merit. (Paras 47-49)

Issues: Whether the State can determine postings based on merit-cum-choice in absence of statutory guidelines? How to ensure fair treatment amidst competing claims for district preferences? (Paras 25, 29, 34)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that while the State has discretion in postings, any process must avoid arbitrariness and align with governance principles, thereby securing fair treatment of teachers based on merit. A clear framework for allocating posts has to be established. (Paras 30-36)

Result: Writ petitions disposed off with directions for reassessment of district allocations. (Paras 51, 52)

Table of Content
1. identification of lead cases and approach to hearing. (Para 2 , 3)
2. details of appointment and selection process for head teachers. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. discontent among candidates regarding district allotment. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
4. arguments against the lack of statutory basis for postings. (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
5. state's justification for district allocation and methodology. (Para 20 , 21 , 23 , 24)
6. judicial observation on rights concerning posting. (Para 25 , 27 , 28)
7. principles of fairness and justice in employment. (Para 30 , 32 , 34)
8. ruling on merit-based postings and state obligations. (Para 37 , 45)
9. direction for addressing grievances on district postings. (Para 46)
10. final directives and disposal of writ petitions. (Para 49 , 51)

JUDGMENT :

JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR, J.

Date : 30-08-2025 Heard the learned Advocates for the petitioners and the learned Advocates for the respondents.

2. In the bunch of the writ petitions, there are two sets of writ petitions; one set of teachers are ‘Head Teachers’ and another set of teachers are ‘Head Masters’. Since the issue(s) in these writ petitions are one and identical, with the consent of the parties, all these writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed off by a common order.

3. For the appreciation, the facts narrated in C.W.J.C.No.11252 of 2025, which deals with the case of Head Teachers and in relation to Head Masters in C.W.J.C. No.12219 of 2025 shall be treated as lead case whereas the counter affidavit filed in the afore-noted C.W.J.C. No.11252 of 2025 duly sworn by the Joint Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar shall be treated as response to all the writ petitions, since the stand of the State is one and identical in all the cases.

4. The 1st set of Teachers were appointed as Head Teachers in primary and elementary schools, pursuant to the examinations conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission (for short ‘the BPSC’) under the Advertisement No. 25/2024. Their appointments are governed by the Bihar Elementary Schools Head Teachers Rules, 2024. Similarly the 2nd set of Teachers were appointed as Head Master in Higher/Senior Secondary Schools, pursuant to the Advertisement No.26/2024 duly conducted by the BPSC in terms with Bihar State School Teacher (Appointment, Transfer, Disciplinary Proceedings and Service Conditions) Rules, 2023.

5. Based upon the performance of the candidates, in the process of selection undertaken by the BPSC, a merit list in respect of the candidates were prepared, on being found them successful. While the exercise of counselling and the verification of the credentials were in process, in the meanwhile, on 02.01.2025, the Director, Primary Education, issued letter to all the District Education Officers across the State of Bihar instructing them that all the successful candidates for the post of Head Teachers must submit three districts preferences through the e-ShikshaKosh portal. The letter made it clear that the district allotment would be carried out on the principle of merit-cum-choice; and if a candidate could not be allotted anyone of the districts of their choice based on merit, the nearest available district from their preferences would be assigned on an administrative standpoint. In pursuant to the letter, all the successful candidates, including the petitioners, who were selected as Head Teachers submitted their district preferences through online, as instructed.

6. On 03.04.2025, the Director, Primary Education, issued a further order disclosing that altogher 35,386 Head Teacher candidates were submitted online preferences, out of which 35,333 online requests were verified. Based on these verified preferences, districts were allotted to those 35,333 candidates.

7. Some of the candidates, on being aggrieved with their non-allocation of preferential posting, preferred C.W.J.C. No.16614 of 2025 before this Court challenging the district allotment made pursuant to the orders dated 02.01.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top