RAJESH SHANKAR
Anil Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo no. 6976 dated 24.09.2016 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by the Disciplinary Authority i.e., the respondent no. 5 – the Superintendent of Police (Administration), Jharkhand Jaguar (STF), Ranchi, whereby a punishment of “one black mark” has been imposed against the petitioner. Further prayer has been made for quashing the order as contained in memo no. 5012 dated 08.08.2018 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) passed by the Appellate Authority i.e., the respondent no. 4 – the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Jaguar (STF), Ranchi, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the letter no. 333 dated 12.12.2018 (Annexure-11 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no. 3 – the Inspector General of Police (Training), Jharkhand, Ranchi to the respondent no. 5, whereby it has been intimated that the revision application preferred by the petitioner cannot be entertained and the information regarding the same should be made available to him.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is
Bharat Iron Works v. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel
Central Bank of India Ltd. v. Prakash Chand Jain
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao v. State of A.P.
Kuldeep Singh v. Commr. of Police
Nand Kishore Prasad v. State of Bihar
Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Admn.
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Rama Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.