S. N. PATHAK
Harendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The issues involved in all these writ petitions are same, similar and identical and as such they have been tagged and heard together on various dates and are being disposed of by this common order.
Prayers made in writ petitions:
2. In W.P.(S). No. 1842 of 2019 petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 19.03.2019, as contained in memo No. 245, issued by respondent No. 5, by which show-cause notice has been issued to the petitioner. Petitioner has further prayed for quashing the letter dated 12.04.2019, issued by respondent No. 4 by which the petitioner has been terminated from service with immediate effect.
3. In W.P.(S). No. 1007 of 2019, prayer has been made for quashing the letter bearing memo No. 554, dated 04.02.2019, issued by respondent No. 2 and the consequential letter bearing memo No. 182/Vi, dt. 16.02.2019, issued by respondent No. 4, whereby the petitioner has been issued show-cause and in the same letter, it has been directed to the respondent No. 4 by respondent No. 2 to terminate the petitioners from services, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of letter dated 04.02.2019. Further prayer has been made for quashing the letter dated
Uptron India Ltd. v. Shammi Bhan
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248, 290-91 : (1978) 2 SCR 621
Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (1985) 3 SCC 398, 424-25 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 672 : 1985 Supp 2 SCR 131
Moti Ram Deka case [(1964) 5 SCR 683 : AIR 1964 SC 600 : (1964) 2 LLJ 467
M.V. Bijlani v. Union of India
Union of India v. Ram Lakhan Sharma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.