SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 229

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
Urmila International Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 2072 of 2023, W.P.(C) No. 2162 of 2023, W.P.(C) No. 2198 of 2023, W.P.(C) No. 2199 of 2023, W.P.(C) No. 2200 of 2023
Decided on : 09-04-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Ms Jyoti Nayan, Mr. Hemant Jain and Mr. Akchansh Kishore, Advocates, Mr.Sumeet Gadodia, Mrs. Shilpi Gadodia, Mr. Prakhar Harit, Mr. Shruti Shekhar, Mr. Naman Singh Bagga, and Mr. Gaurav Rai, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Ms. Sneh Singh, Mr. Rahul Dev and Mr. Seoul Shah, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr.Piyush Chitresh, Mr.Sanjeev Sahay, Mr. Raunak Sahay and Ms. Tejashwi, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Product Shops through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited) Rules, 2022, which imposed penalties on placement agencies for shortfalls in Minimum Guarantee Revenue, was held to be ultra vires the Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915, and unconstitutional as it violated the statutory framework and principles of natural justice.

Headnote:

[EXCISE LAW] - [JHARKHAND EXCISE ACT, 1915; RETAIL RULES, 2022] - [Sections 20, 22, 42, 89 of the Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915; Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Product Shops through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited) Rules, 2022] - The court examined the legality of Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise Rules, which imposed liability on placement agencies for shortfalls in Minimum Guarantee Revenue (MGR). It interpreted Sections 20 and 42 of the Jharkhand Excise Act, emphasizing that penalties for non-payment of excise duties can only be imposed on the licensee, not third parties. The court found Rule 15 to be ultra vires the Act, arbitrary, and unconstitutional, as it improperly shifted the financial burden from the licensee to the placement agencies, violating Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. The court's decision was influenced by the need for adherence to statutory provisions and principles of natural justice in imposing penalties.

Fact of the Case:

A series of writ petitions were filed challenging Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Product Shops through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited) Rules, 2022, which imposed penalties on placement agencies for not achieving Minimum Guarantee Revenue (MGR). The petitioners contended that the rule was ultra vires the Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915, and violated their constitutional rights. The case involved multiple petitioners, each facing significant financial penalties based on the alleged shortfall in MGR.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that Rule 15 of the Retail Rules was unconstitutional and ultra vires the Jharkhand Excise Act. It held that the imposition of penalties on placement agencies for MGR shortfalls was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice, as the agencies were not the licensees responsible for excise duty payments. The court emphasized that penalties could only be imposed on the licensee under the Act, not on third parties.

Issues: 1. Whether Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise Rules imposes liability on placement agencies for MGR shortfalls. 2. Whether the petitioners, having entered into contractual obligations, are estopped from challenging the validity of Rule 15. 3. Whether the forfeiture of the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and the issuance of a show cause notice to Urmila International Services Pvt. Ltd. were lawful.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise Rules was invalid as it improperly shifted the financial responsibility for excise duties from the licensee to the placement agencies, violating the statutory framework established by the Jharkhand Excise Act. The court reiterated that penalties for non-payment of excise duties must be imposed on the licensee, not on third parties, and emphasized the necessity of due process in imposing penalties.

Final Decision: All writ petitions were allowed, with the court quashing the penalties imposed under Rule 15 and the show cause notice issued to Urmila International Services Pvt. Ltd. The court ordered that any future actions regarding forfeiture of EMD must comply with the principles of natural justice and the interpretation of Rule 15 as clarified by the court.

JUDGMENT :

Per Deepak Roshan J.

Present batch of writ applications were earlier tagged to be heard analogous and are being decided by this common order.

2. In W.P.(C) No. 2072 of 2023, Petitioner-Urmila International Services Private Limited has prayed for the following reliefs:-

    (a) for setting aside the Show Cause Notice dated 11.04.2023 bearing no. 767 (Annexure-5) issued by the Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited to Urmila International Services Private Limited;

(b) setting aside the E-Tender notice bearing no. JSBCL/08 dated 10.04.2023 read with its corrigendum contained in Letter No. 780 dated 15.04.2023 (Annexure-4) issued by the Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited;

(c) declaring Clause 8(8) of Section VI of the Tender Document floated by the Respondent as bad in law and hence null and void;

(d) declaring Rule 15 of the “Jharkhand Utpaad (Jharkhand Rajya Beverage Corporation Limited ke Madhyam se Khudra Utpad Dukanoka Sanchalan) Niyamawali, 2022” (“Retail Rules, 2022”) as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India;

3. In W.P.(C) No. 2162 of 2023, Petitioner-M/s. A2Z Infra services Limited has prayed for the following reliefs:-

    (a) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Declaration, declaring Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Product Shops through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited) Rules, 2022, (Annexure-1) as being ultra vires the provisions of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915 (as adopted) and also ultra vires the provisions of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

(b) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction, for quashing/setting aside the order contained in Letter No. 696 dated 01.04.2023 (Annexure-8) issued by Respondent No.3-Managing Director, Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited, wherein Petitioner has been imposed penalty of Rs.1,21,78,40,140/- in terms of Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Product Shops through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited) Rules, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as “Rules of 2022’ for short) (Annexure-1).

(c) In alternative to prayer (i) above, Petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Declaration, declaring that definition of Minimum Guarantee Revenue as contained under Rule 2(xxiv) of Rules of 2022, to the extent it defines Minimum Guarantee Revenue to include only Excise Duty and Excise Transport Duty, is contrary to the definition of Excise Revenue contained under Section 2(ix) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2015 (as adopted).

(d) Further, in alternative to prayer (i) above, Petitioner prays for issuance of a further appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Declaration declaring that the demand raised upon the Petitioner vide Letter No. 696 dated 01.04.2023 (Annexure-8) towards Minimum Guarantee Revenue (for short ‘MGR’) in alleged exercise of the power under Rule 15 of the Rules of 2022 is, per se, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, confiscatory and oppressive, especially in view of the fact that Minimum Guarantee Revenue for the financial year 2022-23 has already been achieved by the State of Jharkhand through Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited.

4. In W.P.(C) No. 2198of 2023, Petitioner-M/s. Sumeet Facilities Limited has prayed for the following reliefs:-

    (a) To hold and declare Rule 15 of the Jharkhand Excise (Operation of Retail Excise Shops by the Jharkhand State Beverage Corporation Limited) Rule, 2022 (Annexure-1) as ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also the provisions of Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915;

(b) To hold and declare that the collection of excise revenue in the form of Excise Duty including Additional Excise Duty as also Excise Transport Duty is the responsibility of a licensee under the Jharkhand Excise Act and such statutory responsibility cannot be contracted out to the placement agency;

(

                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  4
                                  5
                                  6
                                  7
                                  8
                                  9
                                  10
                                  11
                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                  supreme today icon
                                  logo-black

                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                  qr

                                  Scan Me!

                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top