SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD
Anand Kumar S/o Jadunandan Ray – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents: Ranjan Kumar, S.P. Roy

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY PRASAD, J.

1. Initially the petitioner had filed W.P.(S) No.5610 of 2009 on 02.12.2009 for the following reliefs:-

“(i) For the issuance of an appropriate writ order direction for quashing the notification as contained in notification No.28/04 dated 7.1.05 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been punished for the punishment of Censure and 3 annual increments have been withheld with cumulative effect.

(ii) For the issuance of an appropriate writ order direction commanding upon the respondent to forthwith release the entire arrears of difference of salary along with penal interest.”

And for other ancillary reliefs.

2. Thereafter the respondents- State of Jharkhand had appeared and filed counter affidavit on 22.01.2010 and although the copy of counter affidavit filed by the State of Bihar was served to the learned counsel for the petitioner on 28.01.2010 but the said counter affidavit of the State of Bihar is not on record.

3. Thereafter even the petitioner had filed supplementary affidavit on 26.06.2012 and 25.10.2016.

4. Thereafter the amended writ petition was filed on 14.01.2013 which was filed in the light of the order dated 21.12.2012 passed by the Co-ordinate Be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top