Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Rebeka Murmu – Appellant
Versus
Suruj Kisku, wife of late Lakhiram Marandi – Respondent
Order :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant first appeal, under Section 19(1) of FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984, is directed against the order/judgment dated 27.02.2023 and decree dated 13.03.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Pakur in Original Suit No.110 of 2020 whereby and whereunder the suit filed by the appellant under Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 has been dismissed.
I.A. No. 4515 of 2025
2. The instant appeal is admittedly barred by limitation since there is delay of 477 days in preferring the appeal, therefore, an application being I.A. No. 4515 of 2025 has been filed for condoning such delay.
3. This Court, after taking into consideration the fact that the instant appeal has been filed after inordinate delay of 477 days, deems it fit and proper, to first consider the delay condonation application before going into the legality and propriety of the impugned order on merit.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that delay in preferring the appeal may be condoned by allowing the Interlocutory Application on the basis of grounds shown therein treating the same to be sufficient.
5. The ground for condoning the delay in preferring
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
