S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

1. The claim of the writ petitioners for regularisation were rejected in proceedings dated 17.9.2014 on the ground that the employees who were appointed on contract basis and on daily wages, are not entitled for regularisation in accordance with the Government Orders. In this regard, a direction is also sought for in this writ petition to regularise the services of the writ petitioners in the existing vacancy by taking note of the fact that the petitioners have completed 10 years of their continuous service. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners, state that the writ petitioners were employed on daily wage basis in the Irrigation and Public Works Departments in the year 2002 and their names were registered under the Muster Roll on 1.11.2013. As on 30.9.2005, the first respondent sent a communication to the second respondent to furnish the list of daily wage employees, who have completed 10 years of their services for the purpose of sending proposals for regularisation. There was an interdepartmental communication between the respondents 1 and 2 in proceedings dated 7.2.2008 to regularise the services of the daily wage employees,