SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 106

RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
M. Muthuvel – Appellant
Versus
P. Natarajan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:C. Thangaraju, , Advocate.For the Respondents:R1, No Appearance,R2, S. Vadivelu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgement and decree dated 25.09.2018, in M.C.O.P.No. 2128 of 2016, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Special Subordinate Judge No.2), Salem.)

1. The Appeal has been filed against the award dated 25.09.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.2128 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Judge /Special Subordinate Judge No.2, Salem.

2. The claim Petitioner is the Appellant herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

3. The claim Petitioner filed the petition before the Tribunal seeking compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the road traffic accident occurred on 05.08.2016.

4. During the trial, on the side of the claim Petitioner, PW1 was examined, Exs.P1 to Ex.P.9 were marked. D.W.1 and D.W.2 were examined, Exs.R1 and R2 were marked on the side of the Respondents. On the evidence side, Ex.E1 and E2 were marked and court exhibit was Ex.C1 marked.

5. Upon considering both the oral








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top