IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. SUNDAR, K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, JJ.
C. Gopinathan - Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.Nos.8355 and 8357 of 2022 and W.M.P. No.8324 of 2022 in W.P. No.8355 of 2022 and W.M.P. No.8237 of 2022 in W.P. No.8357 of 2022
Decided On : 29-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. temples' historical status and location. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. possibility of a joint survey for legal assessment. (Para 4) |
| 3. preservation of rights of the writ petitioners. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. self-contained nature of the tamil nadu acts. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. procedural outcomes post-survey and order closure. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
[M. SUNDAR, J.,]
Captioned 'Writ Petitions' (hereinafter 'WPs' for the sake of brevity) pertain to two temples viz., '(a) Karupparaya Swami Temple also worshipped as Chinna Karuppa Swami Temple and (b) Karuvandaraya Temple both situate at Pallapalayam Village, Udumalpet Taluk, Tiruppur District' (hereinafter 'said temples' collectively for the sake of convenience and clarity). However, for the sake of specificity, 'Karupparaya Swami Temple also worshipped as Chinna Karuppa Swami Temple' shall be referred to as 'said temple I' and 'Karuvandaraya Temple' shall be referred to as 'said temple II'.
2. The crux and gravamen of the captioned matters is an allegation that said temples are situate in a waterbody and are therefore liable to be demolished.
3. Mr.G.Karthikeyan, learned senior counsel instructed by Mr.E.Karthik Raja, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners submits on instructions that said temples are more than 100 years old and when the temples came into existence, the lands in which they are situate were not classified as waterbodies however as counter affidavits, status reports have been filed and as there is no disputation between the parties regarding the survey numbers and the area where said temples are situate we refrain from delving into the same in detail more so in the light of the order which we propose to make.
4. Learned State counsel Mr.T.K.Saravanan (Additional Government Pleader) very fairly submits that a joint survey can be conducted, a survey report can be drawn up and if said temples are found to be encroachments, action can be initiated either under 'The Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' {hereinafter 'said 1905 Act' for the sake of brevity} or under 'The Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007' (hereinafter 'Tanks Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity). This means that post survey, if said temples are found to be encroachments, they would be show caused and opportunity would be given either in accordance with the scheme of the statute qua said 1905 Act or as per Tanks Act in the light of T.K.Shanmugam principle { T.K. Shanmugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2015 (5) LW 397} This puts to rest the anxiety of the writ petitioners and we make it clear that it is open to the writ petitioners to send representations raising all available points including points raised in the captioned WPs if action under said 1905 Act or Tanks Act is initiated post survey.
5. Before we write the operative potion of the order, we deem it appropriate to write that said temples are admittedly public temples as of today within the meaning of sub-section (3) of Section 1 of 'The TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT , 1959 (Act 22 of 1959)' [hereinafter 'TN HR & CE Act' for the sake of convenience]. Therefore, we suo motu implead the Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.124, Uthamar Gandhi Salai (previously Nungambakkam High Road), Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 and the Assistant Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District as R4 and R5 respectively. Mr.K.Karthikeyan, learned Government Advocate (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice for R4 and R5.
6. As said temples as of today are public temples it is only appropriate that R4 and R5 appoint Fit Person/s forthwith. As Fit Person is a transitory provision we make it clear that all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioners and/or any other person concerned with said temples are preserved/protected vide TN HR & CE Act or under any other law. As reg
The judgment reinforces the necessity for adherence to natural justice in encroachment proceedings, mandating a survey to determine encroachments while preserving the rights of affected parties.
The court mandated the appointment of a Fit Person and a survey to address encroachment on temple property, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures.
The court emphasizes the importance of surveying land to determine its public or private status in encroachment disputes, guiding appropriate legal remedies thereafter.
All temples are public unless declared private by competent jurisdiction, necessitating representation in encroachment proceedings.
Judicial authority mandates enforcement of temple property protections against encroachment, obligating officials to act promptly upon complaints.
The court held that jurisdiction to invoke the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act lies with the Tahsildar over Government Poromboke lands, and disputed ownership claims should be resolved through a sta....
Encroachment upon public land cannot be justified by claims of long-standing use or worship, and statutory provisions must be adhered to.
Temple authorities diligently removed encroachment after survey, fulfilling statutory duties under Puducherry Act; petition disposed as issue moot.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.