SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2514

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. SUNDAR, K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, JJ.
C. Gopinathan - Petitioner 
Versus
The District Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur and Ors. – Respondents 
W.P.Nos.8355 and 8357 of 2022 and W.M.P. No.8324 of 2022 in W.P. No.8355 of 2022 and W.M.P. No.8237 of 2022 in W.P. No.8357 of 2022
Decided On : 29-04-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. G. Karthikeyan, Senior Counsel for Mr. E. Karthik Raja.
For the Respondents:Mr. T.K. Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader, Mr. K. Karthikeyan, Government Advocate (H.R. & C.E.).

The judgment reinforces the necessity for adherence to natural justice in encroachment proceedings, mandating a survey to determine encroachments while preserving the rights of affected parties.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 - Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - The case deals with two temples allegedly situated on a waterbody, with the court recognizing the temples as public and over 100 years old, hence not classified as waterbodies at their inception. A survey is mandated to determine potential encroachments under applicable law, retaining the rights of petitioners to contest any actions post-survey. (Paras 4, 6, 9)

(B) Encroachment Procedure - The court emphasizes adherence to principles of natural justice, stating that if encroachments are found, the involved parties must be notified and given an opportunity to present their objections before any actions are initiated. (Paras 8, 9)

(C) Status of Temples - The temples must appoint a Fit Person under the stewardship of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, preserving rights for declarations regarding the trusteeship or the nature of the temples. (Paras 5, 9.1)

(D) Rights Preserved - The rights and contentions of the writ petitioners regarding the temples are preserved, and any actions taken must follow the established legal procedure. (Paras 9.6, 10)

Findings of Court:
The court disposed of the petitions while ensuring a joint survey is conducted, and any necessary further actions follow the correct legal procedures.

Result: Writ Petitions disposed of as per the stated order.

Table of Content
1. temples' historical status and location. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. possibility of a joint survey for legal assessment. (Para 4)
3. preservation of rights of the writ petitioners. (Para 5 , 6)
4. self-contained nature of the tamil nadu acts. (Para 7 , 8)
5. procedural outcomes post-survey and order closure. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

[M. SUNDAR, J.,]

Captioned 'Writ Petitions' (hereinafter 'WPs' for the sake of brevity) pertain to two temples viz., '(a) Karupparaya Swami Temple also worshipped as Chinna Karuppa Swami Temple and (b) Karuvandaraya Temple both situate at Pallapalayam Village, Udumalpet Taluk, Tiruppur District' (hereinafter 'said temples' collectively for the sake of convenience and clarity). However, for the sake of specificity, 'Karupparaya Swami Temple also worshipped as Chinna Karuppa Swami Temple' shall be referred to as 'said temple I' and 'Karuvandaraya Temple' shall be referred to as 'said temple II'.

2. The crux and gravamen of the captioned matters is an allegation that said temples are situate in a waterbody and are therefore liable to be demolished.

3. Mr.G.Karthikeyan, learned senior counsel instructed by Mr.E.Karthik Raja, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners submits on instructions that said temples are more than 100 years old and when the temples came into existence, the lands in which they are situate were not classified as waterbodies however as counter affidavits, status reports have been filed and as there is no disputation between the parties regarding the survey numbers and the area where said temples are situate we refrain from delving into the same in detail more so in the light of the order which we propose to make.

4. Learned State counsel Mr.T.K.Saravanan (Additional Government Pleader) very fairly submits that a joint survey can be conducted, a survey report can be drawn up and if said temples are found to be encroachments, action can be initiated either under 'The Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' {hereinafter 'said 1905 Act' for the sake of brevity} or under 'The Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007' (hereinafter 'Tanks Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity). This means that post survey, if said temples are found to be encroachments, they would be show caused and opportunity would be given either in accordance with the scheme of the statute qua said 1905 Act or as per Tanks Act in the light of T.K.Shanmugam principle { T.K. Shanmugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2015 (5) LW 397} This puts to rest the anxiety of the writ petitioners and we make it clear that it is open to the writ petitioners to send representations raising all available points including points raised in the captioned WPs if action under said 1905 Act or Tanks Act is initiated post survey.

5. Before we write the operative potion of the order, we deem it appropriate to write that said temples are admittedly public temples as of today within the meaning of sub-section (3) of Section 1 of 'The TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT , 1959 (Act 22 of 1959)' [hereinafter 'TN HR & CE Act' for the sake of convenience]. Therefore, we suo motu implead the Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.124, Uthamar Gandhi Salai (previously Nungambakkam High Road), Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 and the Assistant Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District as R4 and R5 respectively. Mr.K.Karthikeyan, learned Government Advocate (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice for R4 and R5.

6. As said temples as of today are public temples it is only appropriate that R4 and R5 appoint Fit Person/s forthwith. As Fit Person is a transitory provision we make it clear that all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioners and/or any other person concerned with said temples are preserved/protected vide TN HR & CE Act or under any other law. As reg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top