SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3476

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT 
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
Gunaseelan - Appellant
Versus
The State - Respondent
Crl. Appeal (MD) Nos. 493, 506, 521, 562, 563, 570, 744, 751, 830 of 2023, Crl. M.P. (MD) No. 5859 of 2024
Decided On : 04-03-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Thirumahilmaran
For the Respondent: N. Mohideen Basha

The court emphasized that conspiracy and corruption charges may jointly apply to multiple accused involved in fraudulent bank loan approvals, with evidence needed to establish conspiracy beyond doubt.

Headnote:(A) Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 420 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d) - Multiple accused convicted for conspiracy and corruption related to bank loan approval - Evidence established requirements of conspiracy and bribe acceptance, while some charges acquitted due to lack of evidence - Total loss to bank amounted to Rs.1,06,83,052/- - Significant procedural violations in loan sanctioning highlighted. (Paras 3.4, 22, 24, 32).

(B)

Findings of Court:
Court confirmed the convictions for several accused under conspiracy and corruption laws while modifying sentences against some based on mitigating factors like age and health.

(C)

Issues: Main issues discussed included the validity of charges against various appellants, the sufficiency of evidence to support the charge of conspiracy, and the evaluation of procedural correctness in loan approval.

(D)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution established the fraudulent nature of the loan approvals and the requisite elements of conspiracy among the accused, while highlighting that not all parties were held equally liable for actions undertaken. (E)

Result: Conviction of several appellants upheld; sentences reduced for some individuals based on health and settlement actions, while the court confirmed the fines imposed. (Paras 24.2, 27.2, 34).

Table of Content
1. overview of accused and their charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of logistic irregularities and conspiracies (Para 4)
3. appellation arguments against prosecution charges (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's analysis on prosecution's claims and evidences (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. discussion on convictions and sentence conclusions. (Para 20 , 21)
6. consequential application of law and legal reasoning (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

1. The above appellants are the accused in C.C No. 7 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Special Court for the CBI cases, Madurai.

2. They were arrayed as the accused number A1, A2, A4, A3, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12, A13, A14, A15, A16, A17 & A18. Among the original accused, A5 and A18 died during the pendency of trial. The remaining accused faced the trial and A4 was acquitted from all the charges. The remaining accused Nos.1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17 were convicted and sentenced to undergo the following sentences for the offences as stated below:

2.1. A6 has filed Crl.A.(MD).No.493 of 2023 challenging the following conviction and sentence of imprisonment:

Crl. A. (MD) No.Rank of the Accused and NameCharges proved under sectionsPunishment (Imprisonment and Fine)
493/ 2023A-6 N.Gunaseelani) U/s.120B r/w 420 IPC and Sec.7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act, 1988.Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 9 months.
ii) U/s.7 of PC Act, 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 8 months.
iii) U/s.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act, 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 9 months.
The substantial period of sentences shall run concurrently

2.2. A3 has filed Crl.A.(MD).No.506 of 2023 challenging the following conviction and sentence of imprisonment:

Crl. A. (MD) No.Rank of the Accused and NameCharges proved under sectionsPunishment (Imprisonment and Fine)
506/ 2023A-3 Kumaresan120-B r/w 420 IPC Sec.8 & 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.
u/s.8 of PC Act, 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.

2.3. A-1 and A-7 have filed Crl.A.(MD).No.521 of 2023, challenging the following conviction and sentence of imprisonment:

Crl. A. (MD) No.Rank of the Accused and NameCharges proved under sectionsPunishment (Imprisonment and Fine)
521 / 2023A-1 Paul Johnson120-B r/w 420 IPC Sec.8 & 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.
u/s.8 of PC Act, 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.
A-7 Jesuvin Febi120-B r/w 420 IPC and Sec.8 & 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.
u/s.420 IPCRigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.
u/s.8 of PC Act, 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.

2.4. A17 has filed Crl.A.(MD).No.562 of 2023, challenging the following conviction and sentence of imprisonment:

Crl. A (MD) No.Rank of the Accused and NameCharges proved under sectionsPunishment (Imprisonment and Fine)
562/ 2023A-17 Sundaresan120-B r/w 420 IPC and Sec.8 & 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act 1988Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.
u/s.420 IPCRigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,0



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top