Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
P. Kuppusamy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Represented by the Postmaster General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the applicant's service and duties. (Para 2) |
| 2. details of the applicant’s charge sheet and allegations. (Para 3) |
| 3. tribunal's findings on charges against the petitioner. (Para 4) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments against the tribunal's findings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's reaffirmation of authority and procedure in disciplinary actions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 11) |
ORDER :
K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.
1. This Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling the records pertaining to the order of the 5th respondent Tribunal made in O.A. No.310/00657/2014 dated 02.06.2022 and quash the same, consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to settle all the retirement service benefits to the petitioner as if he retired from service on attainment of 65 years of age with effect from 06.02.2016.
2. The brief facts of the case submitted by the applicant before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal are as follows:
2.1. The applicant was initially appointed as Gramin Dak Sevak Mail Deliverer (in short ‘GDS MD’) at Rayandapuram Branch Post Office a/w Tanipadi SO. He was working on regular b
The court affirmed the necessity of stringent penalties for corruption within public service, emphasizing that admissions of guilt during inquiries mitigate claims of unjust treatment.
Judicial review in disciplinary proceedings limited to natural justice and evidence existence; punishment modified from removal to termination for GDS misconduct.
The disciplinary authority's findings were upheld, affirming that the process followed was fair and the penalties imposed were justified based on proven misconduct.
Acquittal in criminal case does not bar departmental dismissal for misappropriation proved on preponderance of probability; punishment proportionate for public fund breach.
The requirement for absolute integrity in public service mandates dismissal for proven misappropriation, regardless of previous quashing on technical grounds.
In disciplinary proceedings for misappropriation, judicial review is limited; cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute views if inquiry fair, findings based on some evidence, and punishment propor....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
