IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
Babu Singh – Petitioner
Versus
Ashoka Chandra Panda - Opp. Parties
I.A. No.8 of 2025 (Arising out of ELPET No.18 of 2024)
Decided On : 09-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under specific provisions. (Para 1) |
| 2. grounds for dismissal of election petition. (Para 2) |
| 3. parties presented their arguments. (Para 3) |
| 4. objections to dismissal raised. (Para 4) |
| 5. election petition needs concise facts. (Para 5) |
| 6. defective verification curable. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 7. non-supply of documents not fatal. (Para 7) |
| 8. election petition cannot be dismissed on threshold. (Para 9) |
| 9. election outcomes require convincing evidence. (Para 10) |
| 10. grounds insufficient for dismissal at this stage. (Para 11) |
| 11. interlocutory application dismissed. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This Interlocutory Application under Order 7 Rule 11, Order 7 Rule 14 and Order 6 Rule 16 of the CPC, 1908 read with Section 81, 83 & 86 of the R.P. Act, 1951 has been filed by the respondent (Babu Singh) in Election Petition No.18/2024 praying for the dismissal of the Election Petition No.18 of 2024 filed by the Election Petitioner under the following grounds i.e.:
(I) neither the relied documents, (on the basis of which, the allegations have been alleged against the respondent), nor the contents thereof have been reflected in the body of the Election Petition with exact verbatim, or the copies of the said documents have been supplied to the respondent along with the copy of the Election Petition, for which, the Election Petition No.18/2024 has been filed by the Election Petitioner violating the mandatory requirements of Section 81(3) of the R.P. Act, 1951. Therefore, the pleadings in the Election Petition are incomplete and the Election Petition is bad for non-disclosure of complete cause of action.
(II) The Election Petition of the Election Petitioner is not entertainable under law due to non-filing of the required affidavit in Form No.25 with the Election Petition as per the requirements of Rule 94(a) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. Filing of affidavit in Form 25 with the Election Petition was mandatory, as corrupt practices have been alleged against the respondent stating about the non-disclosure of all the properties and assets belonging to him (respondent), his spouse and his dependants in Form No.26 at the time of filing his nomination papers misleading as well as misinforming the voters. For which, the Election Petition of the Election Petitioner is in violation of Section 83(1) and 86(1) of the R.P. Act, 1951.
(III) Unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous and vexatious pleadings in Para No.7(A) to 7(O) of the Election Petition, which shall affect the fair trial of the Election Case. For which, the same are liable for striking out as per Order 6, Rule 16 of the CPC, 1908.
(IV) absence and non-disclosure of complete cause of action, material facts and full particulars thereof and non-constitution of any triable issue in the Election Petition.
(V) absence of required verification and affidavit in the Election Petition.
2. To which, the Election Petitioner objected stating in his objection that, he (Election Petitioner) has specifically indicated/reflected the contents of all the documents and annexures relied by him in his Election Petition No.18 of 2024. For which, the said documents cannot be treated as the integral part of his Election Petition. So, there is no requirement under law to provide the copies of the said documents and annexures to the respondent along with the copies of the Election Petition. Because, the said documents are not the integral part of the Election Petition. For which, Election Petition of the Election Petitioner cannot be held as bad or defective for non-compliance of the provisions of Sub-Section (3) of Section 81 of the R.P. Act, 1951.
The copies of the Election Petition containing the contents of the documents relied by him (Election Petitioner) have already been served upon the Respondent along with the notices of the Election Petition. For which, the Election Petition No.18 of 2024 filed by the Election Petitioner does not fall under the trappings of Sub-Section (1) of Se
M. Karunanidhi Vs. Dr. H.V. Hande
U.S. Sashidharan Vs. K. Karunakaran
Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs. Charandas Mahanta & Ors.
Lok Prahari Vs. Union of India & Ors.
S. Rukmini Madegowda Vs. State Election Commission & Ors.
Dwarka Prasad Mishra Vs. Kamalnarain Sharma
Umarddin Behleem Vs. Chandra Shekhar Baid & Ors.
Dr. Sipra (Smt.) & Ors. Vs. Shanti Lal Khoiwal & Ors.
Ravinder Singh Vs. Janmeja Singh
P.A. Mohammed Riyas Vs. M.K. Raghavan & Ors.
C.P. John Vs. Babu M. Palissery
Karim Uddin Barbhuiya Vs. Aminul Haque Laskar & Ors
Hari Shanker Jain Vs. Sonia Gandhi
Chandrakant Uttam Chodankar Vs Dayanand Rayu Mandrakar and Ors.
Mohd. Akbar Vs Ashok Sahu and Ors.
Union of India Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms and Anr
Resurgence India Vs Election Commission of India and Anr
Kisan Shankar Kathore Vs Arun Dattatray Sawant and Ors
Mairembam Prthiviraj Vs Pukhrem Sharatchandra Singh
D. Ramachandran Vs R. V. Janakiraman and Ors
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs Kommuri Pratap Reddy and Ors
P.V. Guru Raj Reddy vs. P. Neeradha Reddy
G.M. Siddeswar Vs Prasanna Kumar
A. Manju Vs Prajwal Revanna and Ors.
Thangjam Arunkumar v. Yumkham Erabot Singh
Umesh Challiyill Vs K. P. Rajendran
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs. Kommuri Pratap Reddy & Others
T. Phungzathang Vs. Hangkhanlian & Others
Manohar Joshi Vs. Nitin Bhaurao Patil
Sahodrabai Rai v. Ram Singh Aharwar
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs. Kommuri Pratap Reddy and Others
An Election Petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold for minor defects; substantial compliance is sufficient, particularly for curable technical defects under the Representation of the People Ac....
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
An election petition must disclose material facts to establish a cause of action; vague allegations are insufficient for dismissal, and substantial compliance with procedural rules is mandated.
Election petitions must plead concise material facts under Section 83(1)(a) RP Act to disclose cause of action; deficient, vague pleadings warrant dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial.
Election petitions must adhere strictly to statutory requirements regarding disclosures, verification, and affidavits; noncompliance may lead to dismissal at the threshold.
Election petition invalid if security for costs not deposited by petitioner at presentation; defect incurable despite later deposit. Non-disclosure of minor cases not corrupt practice without pleadin....
The election petition must contain concise statements of material facts and full particulars of any corrupt practice alleged, and failure to state material facts may lead to dismissal of the petition....
An election petition is liable to be dismissed if it does not disclose a cause of action or if essential material facts are omitted, as prescribed by the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Election petitions must comply with statutory requirements, including proper affidavits and clear allegations, or they risk dismissal for lack of cause of action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.