IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Babu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ashoka Chandra Panda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under specific provisions. (Para 1) |
| 2. grounds for dismissal of election petition. (Para 2) |
| 3. parties presented their arguments. (Para 3) |
| 4. objections to dismissal raised. (Para 4) |
| 5. election petition needs concise facts. (Para 5) |
| 6. defective verification curable. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 7. non-supply of documents not fatal. (Para 7) |
| 8. election petition cannot be dismissed on threshold. (Para 9) |
| 9. election outcomes require convincing evidence. (Para 10) |
| 10. grounds insufficient for dismissal at this stage. (Para 11) |
| 11. interlocutory application dismissed. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
1. This Interlocutory Application under Order 7 Rule 11, Order 7 Rule 14 and Order 6 Rule 16 of the CPC, 1908 read with Section 81, 83 & 86 of the R.P. Act, 1951 has been filed by the respondent (Babu Singh) in Election Petition No.18/2024 praying for the dismissal of the Election Petition No.18 of 2024 filed by the Election Petitioner under the following grounds i.e.:
(II) The Election Petition of the Election Petitioner is not entertainable under law due to non-filing of the required affidavit in Form No.25 with the Election Petition as per the requirements of Rule 94(a) of the Conduct of
M. Karunanidhi Vs. Dr. H.V. Hande
U.S. Sashidharan Vs. K. Karunakaran
Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs. Charandas Mahanta & Ors.
Lok Prahari Vs. Union of India & Ors.
S. Rukmini Madegowda Vs. State Election Commission & Ors.
Dwarka Prasad Mishra Vs. Kamalnarain Sharma
Umarddin Behleem Vs. Chandra Shekhar Baid & Ors.
Dr. Sipra (Smt.) & Ors. Vs. Shanti Lal Khoiwal & Ors.
Ravinder Singh Vs. Janmeja Singh
P.A. Mohammed Riyas Vs. M.K. Raghavan & Ors.
C.P. John Vs. Babu M. Palissery
Karim Uddin Barbhuiya Vs. Aminul Haque Laskar & Ors
Hari Shanker Jain Vs. Sonia Gandhi
Chandrakant Uttam Chodankar Vs Dayanand Rayu Mandrakar and Ors.
Mohd. Akbar Vs Ashok Sahu and Ors.
Union of India Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms and Anr
Resurgence India Vs Election Commission of India and Anr
Kisan Shankar Kathore Vs Arun Dattatray Sawant and Ors
Mairembam Prthiviraj Vs Pukhrem Sharatchandra Singh
D. Ramachandran Vs R. V. Janakiraman and Ors
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs Kommuri Pratap Reddy and Ors
P.V. Guru Raj Reddy vs. P. Neeradha Reddy
G.M. Siddeswar Vs Prasanna Kumar
A. Manju Vs Prajwal Revanna and Ors.
Thangjam Arunkumar v. Yumkham Erabot Singh
Umesh Challiyill Vs K. P. Rajendran
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs. Kommuri Pratap Reddy & Others
T. Phungzathang Vs. Hangkhanlian & Others
Manohar Joshi Vs. Nitin Bhaurao Patil
Sahodrabai Rai v. Ram Singh Aharwar
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Vs. Kommuri Pratap Reddy and Others
An Election Petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold for minor defects; substantial compliance is sufficient, particularly for curable technical defects under the Representation of the People Ac....
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
An election petition must disclose material facts to establish a cause of action; vague allegations are insufficient for dismissal, and substantial compliance with procedural rules is mandated.
Election petitions must plead concise material facts under Section 83(1)(a) RP Act to disclose cause of action; deficient, vague pleadings warrant dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial.
Election petitions must adhere strictly to statutory requirements regarding disclosures, verification, and affidavits; noncompliance may lead to dismissal at the threshold.
Election petition invalid if security for costs not deposited by petitioner at presentation; defect incurable despite later deposit. Non-disclosure of minor cases not corrupt practice without pleadin....
The election petition must contain concise statements of material facts and full particulars of any corrupt practice alleged, and failure to state material facts may lead to dismissal of the petition....
An election petition is liable to be dismissed if it does not disclose a cause of action or if essential material facts are omitted, as prescribed by the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Election petitions must comply with statutory requirements, including proper affidavits and clear allegations, or they risk dismissal for lack of cause of action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.