SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
KRISHNA SHRIPAD DIXIT, CHITTARANJAN DASH, JJ.
State of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Bibhu Prasad Mishra – Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 20325, 25911 of 2014, W.P. (C) No. 7934, 7942 of 2017, W.P. (C) No. 31996 of 2025
Decided On : 24-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. U.C. Behura
For the Respondents: Asok Mohanty, S.P. Patra, Ramakanta Mohanty, D. Mohanty, S. Mohanty, D. Varadwaj, Sumitra Mohanty, Animesh Mohanty, D.K. Mohapatra, A. Sahoo, N. Nayak, A.N. Das, N. Sarkar, E.A. Das B.K. Jena, S.R. Mohapatra, R. Nayak, S. Mohanty, P.K. Behera, P.K. Mohanty, D.S. Das, R.R. Swain, A.K. Nayak, K.C. Mishra, Goutam Misra, D.K. Patra, A.S. Behera, A. Dash, J. Biswal, A. Mohanta, R.R. Jaiswal, A. Sahoo, D.K. Mohapatra, J. Pattanayak, N. Nayak, S. Rath, B. Panigrahi, A. Sathpathy, N. Jena, S.P. Beheera, P.K. Rath, A.K. Rout, S.K. Behera, S.K. Pattnaik, B.K. Dash, A. Behera, P. Nayak, P.K. Sahoo, Pami Rath, P. Mohanty, S. Gumansingh, J. Mohanty, N.K. Mohanty, B.K. Mohanty, Shakti Sekhar, A. Mishra, S. Dash

Promotion processes under service rules must consider both existing and anticipated vacancies, ensuring all eligible candidates are fairly assessed for their rightful place, while no financial benefits accrue for periods without actual occupancy of the promoted positions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 309 - Service matters - Promotion - Review DPC - The impugned orders direct the convening of a review DPC for the promotion of applicants to the Orissa Taxation and Accounts Service cadre concerning existing enhanced vacancies. The Tribunal ruled that the promotional process must consider the overall cadre strength, including existing and anticipated vacancies. Applicants are not entitled to financial benefits for retrospective promotions prior to actual occupancy of the promoted post. (Paras 1, 2, 4.1, 4.3)

(B) Existing Vacancies - The concept of 'existing vacancies' for a DPC must reflect the cadre strength at the time of the DPC meeting and not beforehand, ensuring that all eligible candidates are considered for promotion. (Paras 4.2, 4.4)

(C) Non-joinder of Necessary Parties - The argument regarding necessary parties was dismissed as the newly impleaded parties did not belong to the relevant segment for promotions. (Paras 4.4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged Tribunal orders directing a review DPC to examine 58 vacancies due to procedural omissions in the earlier promotions. The Tribunal emphasized that enhanced cadre positions should be accounted for during promotions and applicants, although retroactively promoted, are not eligible for financial benefits during non-occupancy of the promoted posts.

Findings of Court:
The affirmative orders require that review DPCs include enhanced vacancies, ensuring fair consideration of applicants and reinforcing existing service jurisprudence principles. The judgments are effective and must be implemented within the stipulated period.

Issues: Whether the promotional DPC should account for enhanced cadre strength and vacancy situations, and if non-joinder affects the outcomes achieved.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that promotional recommendations must respect existing and anticipated vacancies as per the relevant service rules, dismissing claims of procedural improprieties raised by the State due to non-joinder arguments.

Result: Petitions dismissed, with orders for implementation set to a deadline.

Table of Content
1. invocation of writ jurisdiction (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding dpc proceedings and necessary parties (Para 3)
3. analysis of dpc process and interpretation of rules (Para 4)

JUDGMENT :

KRISHNA SHRIPAD DIXIT, J.

1. The State & private parties are invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court for assailing two orders dated 21.01.2014 & 13.05.2014 entered by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.383 of 2013 & O.A. No.677 of 2013. By these orders, the following relief has been granted to the answering Opposite Parties, i.e. Bibhu Prasad Mishra & Rasmi Rekha Tripathy, as under:

"In O.A. No.383/2013:

In view of the above, the respondent authorities are directed to convene a review DPC for consideration of the case of the applicant if he comes within the zone of consideration in respect of the remaining 58 vacancies along with other similarly situated persons belonging to Orissa Subordinate Finance Service cadre (ACTO) as per their ratio for their promotion to the cadre of Orissa Taxation & Accounts Service, within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order and if the decision of the DPC goes in favour of the applicant, give him promotion from the date the candidates who were promoted as per the recommendation of the DPC dated 22.12.2012.

However, it need not be said that since the applicant is not working in the promotional post, even though is seniority will be counted along with others who were promoted as per recommendation of the DPC dated 22.12.2012, he shall no the entitled to any financial benefit for that period…"

In O.A. No.677/2013:

In view of the above, the respondent authorities are directed to convene a review DPC for consideration of the case of the applicant if he comes within the zone of consideration in respect of the remaining 58 vacancies along with other similarly situated persons belonging to Orissa Subordinate Finance Service cadre (ACTO) as per their ratio for their promotion to the cadre of Orissa Taxation & Accounts Service, within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order and if the decision of the DPC goes in favour of the applicant, ante date for promotion from the date the candidates who were promoted as per the recommendation of the DPC dated 22.12.2012.

However, it need not be said that since the applicant had worked in the promotional post till her joining in promotion post as per notification dated 07.02.2014, even though her seniority will be counted along with others who were promoted as per recommendation of the DPC dated 22.12.2012, she shall not be entitled to any financial benefit for that period, i.e., the period she had not worked in promotion post.…"

The State & its functionaries were directed to convene a review DPC for consideration of their candidature if they fell within the zone of consideration in respect of the remaining 58 vacancies along with other similarly circumstanced (belonging to Orissa Subordinate Finance Service cadre) as ACTO in terms of their ratio for promotion in Orissa Taxation & Accounts Service. They were also directed contingently to accord retrospective dates of promotion as has been granted to others pursuant to DPC recommendation dated 22.12.2012. This exercise has to be accomplished within two months. However, no financial benefit would be accorded for the retrospective promotion, although they will earn seniority for the said period.

2. FOUNDATIONAL FACT MATRIX OF THESE CASES:

2.1. The Orissa Accounts and Taxation Services Rules, 2011 came to be promulgated by the State Government under the Proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India vide notification dated 22.12.2011. Rule 4(b) provides for appointment to the cadre in question in the ratio of 50% by direct recruitment, 30% by promotion on the basis of seniority-cum-merit and 20% by promotion on the basis of selection, i.e., merit-cum-seniority. The next higher cadre is to the Orissa Taxation & Accounts Service. Rule 10(1) provides for the D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top