Back
M. R. PATHAK, KARDAK ETE
Rashmi Rekha Majumder W/o Sushanta Kumar Majumdar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals against writ petition dismissal (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. submissions on appointment and dpc procedures (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding promotion dates and practices (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's analysis on promotion validity (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. detailed factual background of appellants (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. analysis of dpc procedures and violations (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. o.m. guidelines on reservation and dpc (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. court's legal reasoning on seniority and promotions (Para 17 , 19) |
| 9. conclusion on promotion procedures and adherence to law (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. judicial precedents on affirmative action and promotions (Para 22 , 23) |
| 11. final court's views on delay and technical grounds (Para 24 , 25) |
| 12. final orders and directions for seniority list preparation (Para 26 , 27 , 29 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
1. Heard Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in both the Writ Appeals. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Standing Counsel, Rubber Board appearing for respondent Nos. 2-4 and Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents.
2. These two intra Court Appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 23.03
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
