SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 110

ANOOP CHITKARA
Avtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. V.G. Jauhar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

127

15.09.2021

City-I, Malerkotla District Sangrur (now District Malerkotla)

15/29/61/85 NDPS Act. 1985

1. The petitioner, allegedly a poppy addict, apprehending arrest for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. Vide order dated 25-10-2021, this court had granted interim bail to the petitioner.

2. In paragraph 18 of the petition, it is declared that the accused has no criminal history. Even none of the status reports mentions about any criminal antecedents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been nominated on the basis of the disclosure statement of the main accused, and such statement is legally inadmissible.

4. Ld. Counsel appearing for State opposes the bail and submits that quantity involved is commercial and grant of bail encourages the drug peddlers, and the drug menace is spreading d

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top