Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Nirmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
127 | 03.05.2022 | Sadar Ratia, Tehsil Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad | 15/29/61/85 of NDPS Act |
1. On being named by the co- accused in his custodial interrogation as the seller of the contraband, the petitioner, apprehending arrest for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) as per the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 10 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1 | 60 | 06.06.2009 | 18/61/85 of NDPS Act | Boha (Punjab) |
2 | 360 | 19.10.2011 | 15/27-A/61/85 of NDPS Act | Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad (acquitted) |
3 | 103 | 04.08.2010 | 18/61/85 of NDPS Act | Boha(Punjab) |
4 | 193 | 10.07.2019 | 15/61/85 of NDPS Act | City Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad |
5 | 20 | 28.01.2020 | 18/61/85 of NDPS Act | Javir (Punjab) |
6 | 188 | 10.08.2020 | 15/61/85 of NDPS Act | Sadar Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad |
7 | 349 | 04.07.2018 | 22B/61/85 of NDPS Act | Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad |
8 | 128 | 03.05.2022 | 15/29/61/85 of NDPS Act | Sadar Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad |
3. The police had recovered 10 kgs of poppy husk from Gurmel Singh, who during his interrogation named
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
