ANOOP CHITKARA
Pankaj Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
35 | 25.02.2017 | Kosli, District Rewari, Haryana | 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120- B IPC |
1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.
2. In paragraph 18 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1. | 0018 | 31.1.2017 | 120B, 323, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC | Kosli, District Rewari |
2. | 298 | 26.12.2016 | 120B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC | Kosli, District Rewari |
3. | 0065 | 22.04.2017 | 120B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC | Kosli, District Rewari |
4. | 202 | 26.08.2016 | 406, 420 IPC | Kosli, District Rewari |
3. The petitioner cheated the complainants by assuring them jobs in Railways and, in return, took the money, which those unethical job aspirants also paid willingly.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
5. While opposing the bail, Ld. counsel representing the State contends that given the criminal past, the accused is likely to indulge in crime once
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.