Back
VIKAS BAHL
Balram Garg – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case regarding the fir. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner regarding the civil nature of the dispute. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. observations on the chronology of events indicating civil dispute. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. points emerging from the fir and arguments on civil vs criminal proceedings. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. ratio decidendi regarding the nature of the dispute and quashing of fir. (Para 24) |
| 6. final conclusion quashing the fir and proceedings. (Para 47) |
JUDGMENT
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral). - Present petition has been filed by accused no.1 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') for quashing of FIR bearing No.452 dated 14.11.2021, registered under Section 420 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'), at Police Station Civil Lines, Sirsa, Haryana.
This judgment has been divided into the following sections: -
1. | Background/facts of the case | Para 2 | Pg 2 to 5 |
2. | Arguments on behalf of the petitioner | Para 3 to 5 | Pg 6 to 14 |
3. | Arguments on behalf of respondent No.2 | Para 6 to 10 | Pg 14 to 18 |
4. | Arguments on behalf of the petitioner in rebuttal to arguments of respondent no.2 | Para 11 | Pg 18 |
5 | |||
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
