Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Dharamvir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioner, who stands convicted in the trial for the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 401 CrPC for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 14.1.2009 (upheld in appeal), sentence, charges, and the FIR, based on the compromise with the victim.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections | |
| 40 | 06.04.1998 | Majitha, Amritsar | 420 IPC | |
|
| ||||
| Criminal Case no. before trial Court | 181/19.03.1999 RBT No.440/30.05.2005 Date of decision: 14.01.2009 | |||
| Criminal Appeal No. | 121 of 02.02.2009/12.08.2009 Date of decision: 26.11.2010 | |||
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioner is of cheating the complainant.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the parties i.e. petitioner and the victim have entered into an out of Court compromise. They have annexed the copy of the compromise with this petition as Annexure P-1.
4. On the prayer of the parties in the present petition, the Court had permitted the parties to appear before the concerned Court to record their statements. As per the concerned Court'
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
