Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Rohit Rana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on a compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 257 | 12.6.2020 | Gharaunda, District Karnal | 323/324/34/307/506 IPC and 25 Arms Act |
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the aggrieved person has been impleaded as respondent.
4. On 15-07-2022, the aggrieved person Nikhil Tyagi (R-2) appeared before the JMIC Karnal and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 15-07-2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat or coercion.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5. The State's
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principles for quashing criminal proceedings based on compromise, considering the nature of the offences, societal impact, and the possibility ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to exercise the power under Section 482 of the Code sparingly and with caution, especially for heinous and serious offences, and to consid....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that heinous and serious offences, especially those involving societal impact, cannot be quashed based on compromise. The court emphasized the need....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise, absence of coercion or threat....
The court emphasized the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence and the need to secure the ends of justice in exercising the inherent power for quashing the proceedings based on a compromise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court can exercise its inherent power under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences, considering the ....
The High Court can quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences if a genuine compromise exists and public interest is not adversely affected.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 of CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, even if the offences are non-compoun....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
