SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3435

B. S. WALIA, LALIT BATRA
Rajat – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana

Table of Content
1. petition for parole under section 11(6). (Para 1)
2. explanation of section 11(6) provisions. (Para 2)
3. prior case citations affecting parole approval. (Para 3)
4. court's view on co-convicts and parole. (Para 4 , 5)
5. order to reconsider parole application. (Para 6)
6. conclusion and final decision on the petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

B.S. Walia, J. (Oral)

Prayer in the petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, is for the issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing order Annexure P/1 dated 22.02.2023, passed by the Superintendent, District Jail, Karnal, declining grant of regular parole to the petitioner for ten weeks on the ground that the parole case of co-convict, Akshay Mastana had been forwarded to the relevant authorities, which was pending adjudication, therefore, as per the provisions of Section 11 (6) of the Act ibid, the parole case of the petitioner could not be initiated.

2. As per paragraph No.4 of the preliminary submissions of the reply dated 12.04.2023, it has been mentioned that "in reference to grant of parole to the prisoner, it is intimated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top