SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 413

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
Sanjiv Kumar @ Kauwa - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRR-1089-2009 (Q&M)
Decided On : 30-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent:Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhaliwal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab

The court upheld the conviction for narcotics possession based on procedural adherence, emphasizing juvenile sentencing principles adjusted for time elapsed.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20 - Conviction under NDPS Act for possession of narcotics, sections regarding search and seizure were adhered to, and issues regarding age of the convict were resolved under Juvenile Justice Act provisions - The accused was caught with 2 Kgs of sulfa and was found to have reposed faith in the police for search - The conviction followed necessary procedural guidelines. (Paras 4, 21-26)

(B) Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Section 15 - The mandate requires a juvenile to be sent to a special home upon conviction, but due to time lapsed, sentence shall be reduced to time already served - The court mentions reformation approach towards juvenile sentencing. (Paras 21-26)

Facts of the case:
The FIR was registered on 17.03.2001; the accused was convicted under the NDPS Act on 11.05.2005, with proceedings lasting over 24 years until this revision petition.

Findings of Court:
The procedural law regarding search was upheld, and the conviction was maintained due to compelling evidence - The juvenile's sentence is adjusted based on eligibility of reformation from the special home, recognizing the time elapsed.

Issues: The main issue is the adherence to procedural requirements under the NDPS Act and the appropriate sentencing for a juveniles that age - The impact of time elapsed on the sentence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that necessary consent and option were given to the accused during the search; hence, the procedure was valid - Additionally, juvenile justice principles shaped the conclusion on sentencing.

Result: Sentence reduced to time already undergone.

Table of Content
1. the procedural adherence led to conviction. (Para 1 , 10)
2. arguments against independent witness and prosecution were found lacking. (Para 14 , 19)
3. lengthy delays necessitate reevaluation of juvenile sentencing. (Para 20 , 26)
4. juvenile sentencing requires compliance with specific laws. (Para 21 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.

The present revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 24.03.2009 passed by Judge, Special Court, Patiala whereby the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.05.2005 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Board, Ludhiana has been dismissed.

2. The FIR in the present case came to be registered on 17.03.2001. The judgment of conviction was passed on 11.05.2005 by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Board, Ludhiana. The Appeal filed against the order of conviction was dismissed on 24.03.2009 by the Judge, Special Court, Patiala. The instant revision petition was filed on 30.04.2009 and has come up for final hearing now i.e. after a period of more than 24 years from the date of registration of the FIR.

3. In brief the prosecution case is that on 17-3-2001, ASI Ajit Singh sent a ruqa and got the case registered under Section 20 of NDPS Act. The facts of the case are that when ASI Ajit Singh alongwith HC Prem Singh, HC Balwinder Singh no.413, C.Harish Kumar 1416, C. Gurmit Singh no.362, C-Jamail Singh no.2985, SPO Veersingh no.745, PHG Gurdev Singh no.30088 and also ASI Bhupinder Rai, Incharge, P.P.Bahadurgarh, riding on the official vehicle Allywn Nissan bearing PB-ll-A-5986 being driven by C.Ram Lakhan no.2082, for patrolling and to nab bad elements were going from V.Kauli to V. Mohabbat Pur then at about 6-00 p.m. when they reached near Gurudwara Sri Ishar- Shar Sahib in the area of Mohabbat Pur, from the opposite side two men were been coming on a scooter. On seeing the police party, they tried to turn back and on suspicion, they were chased. They were asked to stop, but after throwing the scooter they ran towards the fields. Then the police party nabbed both the accused. ASI Ajit Singh with the help of HC Balwinder Singh no.1113, C. Gurmit Singh no.362, C. Jamail Singh no.2985, PHG Gurdev Singh arrested accused Sanjiv Kumar alias Kauwa s/o Som Nath alias Babbi, r/o Bajakhana School near Fire Brigade, Patiala. On checking, it was found that some contraband was tied around his waist. The accused was asked by ASI Ajit Singh that he wanted to search his person and if he so desires, some Gazetted Officer or Magistrate could be called, However, he reposed faith in the police and agreed to get his search conducted from the police. In the meanwhile, Kashmir Singh s/o late Mr. Balwant Singh, Jat, r/o V. Buddan Pur, Gurdwara Nim Sahib also reached there, who was briefed about the facts and was joined in the police party. The wireless message was flashed and on receiving a telephonic call, Bhupinder Jit Singh Virk, DSP, Rural, Patiala reached at the spot. On reaching there, DSP Bhupinderjit Singh Virk disclosed his identity to accused Sanjiv Kumar and to Amrik Singh s/o Barn Ram, who was already arrested by ASI Bhupinder Rai, separately. Dy.S.P. Bhupinderjit Singh asked both the accused, whether they intended to get their person searched from him or some Gazetted officer, but both of them reposed faith in the Dy S.P. and offered themselves for search. ASI Ajit Singh searched the person of accused Sanjiv Kumar and recovered Sulfa wrapped in two polythene bags tied with his waist. The Sulfa in polythene bags was made into one parcel. Two samples of 100 grams each were separated and made into a parcel and remaining sulfa came to be 1 Kg.800 grams, which was put into a box and made into a parcel. All the three parcels were sealed with the seals of JS of ASI Ajit Singh and BS of Dy. S.P. After use the seals were handed over to PW Kashmir Singh. The case property and sample duly sealed were taken into possession vide separate recovery me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top